CNN: Hearing for Brown University Doctor Deported to Lebanon Canceled After Attorneys Withdraw

EXCERPT:

JACKSON: “It's unclear what's going on. The judge has given the indication that he wants an update within a week as to the specifics as to why the order was violated and why she was removed. However, we do know that there was an attorney with the attorneys withdrew and they gave the indication that it was because of further due diligence. Now, attorneys certainly have the right to withdraw from a case for multiple reasons. Do you see eye to eye with your client? Are there things your client did not tell you? Are there misrepresentations the client made? Are there certain things that you cannot argue in good faith? Have you learned more information that would give you pause with respect to the representation? And so the specifics of it, Pamela and Wolf, we are not clear on. What we just are clear on is that the attorneys who were representing her after looking at the case further made the decision that they would remove themselves. I think in the coming days, it'll be clear as to why. Now, certainly the government, that is the parties who are responsible for the removal, could have given the attorneys further information that is not available to the public. And that may indeed be something that gave those attorneys the information they needed to withdraw.”