DNI Whistleblower’s Atty.: By Law, My Client Should Be Able to Meet with Congress Members

‘Second, the issue of credibility, it’s been kind of bothering me for quite some time because whenever somebody thinks about credibility, they’re questioning, you know, is somebody credible?’

EXCERPT:

BAKAJ: “First of all, that credibility determination has no bearing on our client’s right to take this to Congress. By law, one, that disclosure and its contents should be sent to the Senate and House Intelligence Committees. And two, our client should be able to and must be able to, by law, meet with those members. Second, the issue of credibility, it’s been kind of bothering me for quite some time because whenever somebody thinks about credibility, they’re questioning, you know, is somebody credible? Can you trust this particular individual? In this particular case, what the ICIG or the DNI is looking at is saying, well, because the whistleblower read something in a report or was part of a meeting, and perhaps Tulsi Gabbard herself said, well, I didn’t do x because she’s the first person, her word is taken over somebody else’s. In my opinion, that’s a questionable way to define or figure out credibility.”

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact