Abortion Hearing Guest Cannot Explain Difference Between Hour Old Baby She Condones Aborting and 2 Year Old

‘I trust people to make decisions about their body’

This story is cross-posted at our consumer site, Grabien News. Watch it there – without audiomarks.

EXCERPT:

JOHNSON: “If it is not lawful and morally acceptable to take the life of a 10-year-old child -- I assume you agree with that, right, that would be wrong, correct?"
ARRAMBIDE: "I believe that that is wrong."
JOHNSON: "OK. And a 2-year-old-child, same thing, that would be murder -- we would all agree that's wrong. Then what is the principal distinction between the human being that is 2 years old or 9 months old, or 1 week old, or an hour old than one that is 8 inches further up the birth canal in the uterus? What's the difference? Why is it OK in the latter case, and not the former cases?"
ARRAMBIDE: "I trust people to determine what to do with their own body."
JOHNSON: "Wow!"
ARRAMBIDE: "Full stop."
JOHNSON: "Wow! Full stop, indeed. And that describes right there exactly what this is about. There's a legal issue here. But underneath that is a moral issue. It's about reality. It's about science.”

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Abortion Hearing Guest Cannot Explain Difference Between Hour Old Baby She Condones Aborting and 2 Year Old