The Hill’s John Solomon Lays out Case for How Strzok’s Bias Impacted His FBI Work

RUSH EXCERPT:

SOLOMON: "The most important thing is that Peter Strzok testified, he didn't believe any political bias affected his action. He's giving a factual statement, yeah, we were talking about Russia, we are talking about the special counsel. We now know for sure that was what they were talking about. Most important thing going on, let's take a look at the five things that we now know they did that defy their training. The excepted circular intelligence, they knew everything was coming from the Hillary Clinton funded dossier but made it look like it was coming from multiple sources. Two weeks before the election, they are trying to force through a warrant on the term campaign before the election was over. The day after the election, they make and all call, we need all the rockers reporting on the term campaign, let's start collecting him beard the day after he is elected. You get to this point in may where they are about to turn the case over and allow the justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor, they kind of know it's a flimsy evidence. All of these things suggest that they are going by their normal training, their normal behavior, to Mike as counterintelligence agents. That's why this question of political bias is going to get answered soon. We want to sum it up, they used their power, try to steal, anyway, the presidential election by favoring one candidate over another candidate, and letting one candidate who should've been indicted and turning everything they had over to the other."