Mike Lawler Asks If Anybody Has Seen the Second Signal Chat from DoD, Abby Phillip Shoots Back ‘Would You Like the NYT to Publish It?’

PHILLIP Is that not ░░░░░░░░ to you LAWLER Well ░░░░░░░░ of all the Biden ░░░░░░░░ s CISA without guidance ░░░░░░░░ members of the Department ░░░░░░░░ Defense and the intelligence ░░░░░░░░ to use Signal PHILLIP ░░░░░░░░ classified information TANDEN Not ░░░░░░░░ classified information That is ░░░░░░░░ LAWLER No excuse me ░░░░░░░░ me finish Let me ░░░░░░░░ I m sorry I ░░░░░░░░ t think they re ░░░░░░░░ Signal for classified information ░░░░░░░░ You know that LAWLER ░░░░░░░░ of all PHILLIP You ░░░░░░░░ that LAWLER Don t ░░░░░░░░ that because I didn ░░░░░░░░ say that PHILLIP Okay ░░░░░░░░ So I said the ░░░░░░░░ s CISA PHILLIP What ░░░░░░░░ that have to do ░░░░░░░░ anything LAWLER Because multiple ░░░░░░░░ use CISA including nearly ░░░░░░░░ use Signal including nearly ░░░░░░░░ single member of Congress ░░░░░░░░ Yeah but the context ░░░░░░░░ is about classified information ░░░░░░░░ s a change of ░░░░░░░░ LAWLER No it s ░░░░░░░░ a change of the ░░░░░░░░ The bottom line is ░░░░░░░░ is used for communication ░░░░░░░░ all times The second ░░░░░░░░ that is being referred ░░░░░░░░ have you seen any ░░░░░░░░ the contents of it ░░░░░░░░ Would you like The ░░░░░░░░ York Times to publish ░░░░░░░░ LAWLER If anybody would ░░░░░░░░ to show the contents ░░░░░░░░ PHILLIP I think the ░░░░░░░░ is that they included ░░░░░░░░ same classified information as ░░░░░░░░ other chat LAWLER You ░░░░░░░░ jump to the end ░░░░░░░░ But the bottom line ░░░░░░░░ you have Signal which ░░░░░░░░ used widely widely by ░░░░░░░░ officials by members of ░░░░░░░░ PHILLIP Okay Congressman I ░░░░░░░░ to move on because ░░░░░░░░ I think we should ░░░░░░░░ be super clear Signal ░░░░░░░░ not allowed to be ░░░░░░░░ for classified information LAWLER ░░░░░░░░ said that it is ░░░░░░░░ Everybody understands that LAWLER ░░░░░░░░ point is PHILLIP Hold ░░░░░░░░ Hold on, congressman.”