To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Fox’s Mark Levin Drops an Attack on John Roberts Defending Federal Judges
Source
Fox News Channel (FNC)
, Mediaite

Name: Fox News Channel (FNC)
URL: https://www.foxnews.com

Name: Mediaite
URL: http://www.mediaite.com/
Show
The Story With Martha MacCallum

Name: The Story With Martha MacCallum
URL: http://insider.foxnews.com/show/story-martha-maccallum
Persons
Martha MacCallum
, Mark Levin

Name: Martha MacCallum
Employment: Fox News Channel
Position: Anchor

Name: Mark Levin
Employment: Premiere Broadcasting
Position: Lawyer, author, radio host
Event
Event location
–
Uploaded
03/19/2025 06:32 pm
Owner
Ann (staff)
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1280x720)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:04:07
Views
14
Purchases
2
Transcript
MacCALLUM 600 and some ░░░░░░░░ at this level you ░░░░░░░░ in terms of the ░░░░░░░░ Court if it s ░░░░░░░░ egregious as you say ░░░░░░░░ would you expect to ░░░░░░░░ from them We know ░░░░░░░░ Justice Roberts weighed in ░░░░░░░░ on behalf of the ░░░░░░░░ s right to say ░░░░░░░░ and the process is ░░░░░░░░ to play out There ░░░░░░░░ a hearing on March ░░░░░░░░ What do you think ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court should do ░░░░░░░░ anything LEVIN I would ░░░░░░░░ that John Roberts who ░░░░░░░░ knew before he was ░░░░░░░░ judge when we both ░░░░░░░░ in the Reagan Administration ░░░░░░░░ s time to grow ░░░░░░░░ pair judge Think about ░░░░░░░░ Rehnquist What would Justice ░░░░░░░░ the Chief Justice have ░░░░░░░░ when those four originalists ░░░░░░░░ weeks ago when this ░░░░░░░░ involving another rogue Democrat ░░░░░░░░ ordered the President of ░░░░░░░░ United States to spend ░░░░░░░░ on foreign activities What ░░░░░░░░ Rehnquist have done Would ░░░░░░░░ have joined the four ░░░░░░░░ would he have joined ░░░░░░░░ radical three This is ░░░░░░░░ issue of separation of ░░░░░░░░ And if it s ░░░░░░░░ resolved you basically in ░░░░░░░░ form of your question ░░░░░░░░ answered it How the ░░░░░░░░ are we going to ░░░░░░░░ 680 individual unelected federal ░░░░░░░░ they re federal district ░░░░░░░░ not federal national judges ░░░░░░░░ sitting there behind their ░░░░░░░░ with their two or ░░░░░░░░ clerks saying You know ░░░░░░░░ don t like this ░░░░░░░░ of Trump sending this ░░░░░░░░ don t like this ░░░░░░░░ of banning transgender I ░░░░░░░░ t like this idea ░░░░░░░░ is exactly what Locke ░░░░░░░░ Montesquieu and Jefferson and ░░░░░░░░ warned When you have ░░░░░░░░ combination of branches rather ░░░░░░░░ separation of branches and ░░░░░░░░ did too you have ░░░░░░░░ tyranny And I don ░░░░░░░░ care about what John ░░░░░░░░ pronounces from the bench ░░░░░░░░ your job Chief Justice ░░░░░░░░ the United States Don ░░░░░░░░ get into the political ░░░░░░░░ Fix it Because if ░░░░░░░░ don t fix it ░░░░░░░░ re going to lose ░░░░░░░░ constitutional construct or Congress ░░░░░░░░ going to have to ░░░░░░░░ out some way to ░░░░░░░░ it One other thing ░░░░░░░░ idea and I ve ░░░░░░░░ heard it on my ░░░░░░░░ network from some of ░░░░░░░░ former whatevers that we ░░░░░░░░ t raise our voice ░░░░░░░░ s our job This ░░░░░░░░ exists for we the ░░░░░░░░ It doesn t exist ░░░░░░░░ John Roberts the judges ░░░░░░░░ or anybody else This ░░░░░░░░ thing was set up ░░░░░░░░ us to protect us ░░░░░░░░ these judges are conducting ░░░░░░░░ this way when they ░░░░░░░░ interfering with an election ░░░░░░░░ they re grabbing seizing ░░░░░░░░ in front of our ░░░░░░░░ we re all smart ░░░░░░░░ see it from the ░░░░░░░░ Branch a president of ░░░░░░░░ United States he s ░░░░░░░░ nationally they re created ░░░░░░░░ Congress They re not ░░░░░░░░ in the Constitution They ░░░░░░░░ using a power judicial ░░░░░░░░ that s not even ░░░░░░░░ the Constitution that was ░░░░░░░░ by the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ 1803 They should at ░░░░░░░░ have some level of ░░░░░░░░ to the President of ░░░░░░░░ United States And notice ░░░░░░░░ other thing Compare the ░░░░░░░░ of restraining orders injunctions ░░░░░░░░ reversals that Donald Trump ░░░░░░░░ had with the last ░░░░░░░░ presidents of the United ░░░░░░░░ It is grotesque MacCALLUM ░░░░░░░░ it s very interesting ░░░░░░░░ you know last time ░░░░░░░░ it was all Department ░░░░░░░░ Justice Now you ve ░░░░░░░░ Pam Bondi there and ░░░░░░░░ re trying she s ░░░░░░░░ to crack down on ░░░░░░░░ So now you sort ░░░░░░░░ see this other area ░░░░░░░░ the whack a mole ░░░░░░░░ up So now it ░░░░░░░░ going to be across ░░░░░░░░ country and judges and ░░░░░░░░ coming from these judges ░░░░░░░░ I think it s ░░░░░░░░ to be interesting to ░░░░░░░░ if these tests hold ░░░░░░░░ And it looks like ░░░░░░░░ this point the White ░░░░░░░░ is in you know ░░░░░░░░ s better to ask ░░░░░░░░ than permission mode And ░░░░░░░░ heard today they re ░░░░░░░░ to keep sending people ░░░░░░░░ they think are members ░░░░░░░░ gangs and dangerous to ░░░░░░░░ United States back where ░░░░░░░░ came from LEVIN Just ░░░░░░░░ quick thing MacCALLUM Yeah ░░░░░░░░ ahead LEVIN the White ░░░░░░░░ is defending the executive ░░░░░░░░ separation of powers and ░░░░░░░░ Constitution from rogue radical ░░░░░░░░ wing Democrat lawyers in ░░░░░░░░ robes That s what ░░░░░░░░ White House is doing ░░░░░░░░ re not picking a ░░░░░░░░ They re responding to ░░░░░░░░ who are trying to ░░░░░░░░ their power That s ░░░░░░░░ they re doing MacCALLUM ░░░░░░░░ and there s action ░░░░░░░░ single day So there ░░░░░░░░ a lot more coming ░░░░░░░░ them than we ve ░░░░░░░░ in the past because ░░░░░░░░ s working hard to ░░░░░░░░ a lot done very ░░░░░░░░ It s gonna be ░░░░░░░░ interesting to watch this ░░░░░░░░ out Mark Levin always ░░░░░░░░ to see you Mark ░░░░░░░░ you very much.”
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.