Fox’s Mark Levin Drops an Attack on John Roberts Defending Federal Judges

EXCERPT:

LEVIN: "I would say that John Roberts, who I knew before he was a judge, when we both worked in the Reagan administration, it’s time to grow a pair, judge. Think about Justice Rehnquist. What would Justice Rehnquist, the Chief Justice, have done when those four originalists two weeks ago when this case involving another rogue Democrat judge ordered the President of the United States to spend money on foreign activities. What would Rehnquist have done? Would he have joined the four or would he have joined the radical three? This is an issue of separation of powers. And if it’s not resolved, you basically, in the form of your question, have answered it. How the hell are we going to have 680 individual, unelected federal judges, they’re federal district judges, not federal national judges, all sitting there behind their desks with their two or three clerks saying, 'You know, I don’t like this idea of Trump sending this. I don’t like this idea of banning transgender, I don’t like this idea.' This is exactly what Locke and Montesquieu and Jefferson, and Madison warned. When you have a combination of branches rather than separation of branches, and Scalia did too, you have a tyranny. And I don’t care about what John Roberts pronounces from the bench. Do your job, Chief Justice of the United States. Don’t get into the political fight. Fix it! Because if you don’t fix it, we’re going to lose our constitutional construct or Congress is going to have to figure out some way to fix it.”

(Via Mediaite)