Without further Ado please ░░░░░░░░ me in welcoming to ░░░░░░░░ stage don t clouder ░░░░░░░░ Nobel Prize winner in ░░░░░░░░ well I hope there ░░░░░░░░ t a significant miscommunication ░░░░░░░░ the invitation for this ░░░░░░░░ talk I m going ░░░░░░░░ give another one later ░░░░░░░░ the keynote address I ░░░░░░░░ asked for the first ░░░░░░░░ some brief remarks as ░░░░░░░░ to Young Korean scientists ░░░░░░░░ I m not sure ░░░░░░░░ t sure how to ░░░░░░░░ that so here s ░░░░░░░░ best shot at it ░░░░░░░░ it really has very ░░░░░░░░ to do with Quantum ░░░░░░░░ but here are my ░░░░░░░░ thoughts long time ago ░░░░░░░░ my whole life I ░░░░░░░░ been an experimental physicist ░░░░░░░░ had the distinct privilege ░░░░░░░░ literally being able to ░░░░░░░░ to God even though ░░░░░░░░ m an atheist in ░░░░░░░░ Physics laboratory I am ░░░░░░░░ to ask carefully posed ░░░░░░░░ based questions and correspondingly ░░░░░░░░ universal truth to do ░░░░░░░░ and make careful measurements ░░░░░░░░ natural phenomenon in the ░░░░░░░░ laboratory I once settled ░░░░░░░░ debate between Einstein and ░░░░░░░░ on one hand uh ░░░░░░░░ Niels Bohr and John ░░░░░░░░ Neumann on the other ░░░░░░░░ a laboratory I asked ░░░░░░░░ simple question which one ░░░░░░░░ these two groups was ░░░░░░░░ and which one was ░░░░░░░░ I didn t know ░░░░░░░░ of time what answer ░░░░░░░░ would get I just ░░░░░░░░ I could get an ░░░░░░░░ nonetheless I found real ░░░░░░░░ for the answer I ░░░░░░░░ that real truth can ░░░░░░░░ be found by observing ░░░░░░░░ phenomena uh to uh ░░░░░░░░ carefully observing natural phenomena ░░░░░░░░ science is always based ░░░░░░░░ good experiments good observations ░░░░░░░░ overrule purely speculative Theory ░░░░░░░░ provide uh sloppy experiments ░░░░░░░░ the other hand are ░░░░░░░░ counterproductive and provide scientific ░░░░░░░░ that is why good ░░░░░░░░ repeat each other s ░░░░░░░░ carefully for inspiration to ░░░░░░░░ scientists I would suggest ░░░░░░░░ today is an opportune ░░░░░░░░ for careful observations of ░░░░░░░░ why the curl of ░░░░░░░░ current world I observe ░░░░░░░░ literally a Wash saturated ░░░░░░░░ pseudoscience with bad science ░░░░░░░░ scientific misinformation and disinformation ░░░░░░░░ what I will call ░░░░░░░░ technocons are the application ░░░░░░░░ scientific disinformation for opportunistic ░░░░░░░░ non science business managers ░░░░░░░░ politically appointed lab directors ░░░░░░░░ the like are very ░░░░░░░░ snowed by scientific disinformation ░░░░░░░░ they participate in its ░░░░░░░░ the purpose is just ░░░░░░░░ to inspire you as ░░░░░░░░ scientists to observe nature ░░░░░░░░ so that you too ░░░░░░░░ determine real truth use ░░░░░░░░ information gained from carefully ░░░░░░░░ experiments and research to ░░░░░░░░ the spread of scientific ░░░░░░░░ disinformation and technicons well ░░░░░░░░ scientists can help solve ░░░░░░░░ World s Problems by ░░░░░░░░ as scientific fact checkers ░░░░░░░░ fact Checker s most ░░░░░░░░ problem unfortunately is determining ░░░░░░░░ is true and what ░░░░░░░░ not the world is ░░░░░░░░ with someone else s ░░░░░░░░ of Truth as an ░░░░░░░░ to real truth perception ░░░░░░░░ Truth frequently differs significantly ░░░░░░░░ real truth moreover a ░░░░░░░░ sufficient promotion and advertising ░░░░░░░░ of truth becomes truth ░░░░░░░░ s promotion by a ░░░░░░░░ Enterprise is called marketing ░░░░░░░░ used in the furtherance ░░░░░░░░ political commercial or various ░░░░░░░░ Ends by us promoters ░░░░░░░░ promotion is done by ░░░░░░░░ government or political groups ░░░░░░░░ s called spin or ░░░░░░░░ to such a promoter ░░░░░░░░ of truth is truth ░░░░░░░░ you can sell it ░░░░░░░░ must be true if ░░░░░░░░ can t sell it ░░░░░░░░ must be false persistence ░░░░░░░░ of Truth is also ░░░░░░░░ if you can sell ░░░░░░░░ if you want to ░░░░░░░░ it and you can ░░░░░░░░ sell it that s ░░░░░░░░ you re changing you ░░░░░░░░ change truth you can ░░░░░░░░ false observations if necessary ░░░░░░░░ favorite in this act ░░░░░░░░ chat GPT it s ░░░░░░░░ good at doing exactly ░░░░░░░░ it has lots of ░░░░░░░░ made pseudoscience that copy ░░░░░░░░ manipulate and emulate it ░░░░░░░░ lie and cheat even ░░░░░░░░ than its human matters ░░░░░░░░ writings are abundant in ░░░░░░░░ in literature you will ░░░░░░░░ there s far more ░░░░░░░░ than there is non ░░░░░░░░ pseudoscience is science fiction ░░░░░░░░ neither computers nor human ░░░░░░░░ checkers can in general ░░░░░░░░ fact from fiction or ░░░░░░░░ from science fiction or ░░░░░░░░ pseudoscience hey if Starship ░░░░░░░░ can fly faster than ░░░░░░░░ speed of light then ░░░░░░░░ s got to be ░░░░░░░░ Right all you need ░░░░░░░░ dilithium crystals right wrong ░░░░░░░░ truth is not malleable ░░░░░░░░ only be found by ░░░░░░░░ careful observations well tested ░░░░░░░░ of physics and observational ░░░░░░░░ are important guide to ░░░░░░░░ you to distinguish truth ░░░░░░░░ perception of Truth now ░░░░░░░░ am not alone in ░░░░░░░░ uh observing the dangerous ░░░░░░░░ of pseudoscience recently the ░░░░░░░░ Foundation has formed a ░░░░░░░░ panel to address the ░░░░░░░░ called The International Panel ░░░░░░░░ information environment they planned ░░░░░░░░ model it after the ░░░░░░░░ s International Panel on ░░░░░░░░ change the IPCC I ░░░░░░░░ personally that they are ░░░░░░░░ a big mistake in ░░░░░░░░ effort because in my ░░░░░░░░ the IPCC is one ░░░░░░░░ the worst sources of ░░░░░░░░ misinformation uh what I ░░░░░░░░ about to recommend is ░░░░░░░░ furtherance of that of ░░░░░░░░ aims of that panel ░░░░░░░░ the past we say ░░░░░░░░ act have acted as ░░░░░░░░ for Journal articles peer ░░░░░░░░ and we have peer ░░░░░░░░ each other s work ░░░░░░░░ as just to prevent ░░░░░░░░ proliferation of scientific misinformation ░░░░░░░░ process recently seems to ░░░░░░░░ broken down somehow it ░░░░░░░░ to be re energized ░░░░░░░░ my career as a ░░░░░░░░ I have frequently been ░░░░░░░░ to referee lots of ░░░░░░░░ journal articles here I ░░░░░░░░ offer a few pieces ░░░░░░░░ advice first very importantly ░░░░░░░░ work should be based ░░░░░░░░ careful observations of nature ░░░░░░░░ must try hard and ░░░░░░░░ what I will call ░░░░░░░░ elephant in the room ░░░░░░░░ in hiding in plain ░░░░░░░░ uh ask very simple ░░░░░░░░ I found an elephant ░░░░░░░░ the room that I ░░░░░░░░ be describing in my ░░░░░░░░ address in quantum mechanics ░░░░░░░░ have a second elephant ░░░░░░░░ the room that I ░░░░░░░░ recently discovered regarding climate ░░░░░░░░ I believe that the ░░░░░░░░ change is not a ░░░░░░░░ real truth could be ░░░░░░░░ if and only if ░░░░░░░░ learn to recognize and ░░░░░░░░ good science it s ░░░░░░░░ true when real truth ░░░░░░░░ Politically Incorrect and does ░░░░░░░░ reflect the side uh ░░░░░░░░ reflect political business aims ░░░░░░░░ desires of leaders even ░░░░░░░░ scientific Community can sometimes ░░░░░░░░ deluded by pseudoscience recall ░░░░░░░░ you want pseudoscience to ░░░░░░░░ true just simply spin ░░░░░░░░ and becomes true importantly ░░░░░░░░ referee must know and ░░░░░░░░ mathematically based physics a ░░░░░░░░ scientist must also know ░░░░░░░░ to derive and solve ░░░░░░░░ equations that was the ░░░░░░░░ thing I learned as ░░░░░░░░ undergraduate at Caltech follow ░░░░░░░░ teaching of Sir Isaac ░░░░░░░░ he found that the ░░░░░░░░ is governed by differential ░░░░░░░░ we had to invent ░░░░░░░░ to do it but ░░░░░░░░ did it a referee ░░░░░░░░ correctly identify the dominant ░░░░░░░░ as a starting point ░░░░░░░░ way to do this ░░░░░░░░ with order of magnitude ░░░░░░░░ of the various conceivable ░░░░░░░░ I one of my ░░░░░░░░ I can give later ░░░░░░░░ won t have time ░░░░░░░░ do it though regarding ░░░░░░░░ change I think the ░░░░░░░░ process I believe has ░░░░░░░░ misidentified by factors of ░░░░░░░░ So if you re ░░░░░░░░ by a factor of ░░░░░░░░ 200 uh your process ░░░░░░░░ way too small to ░░░░░░░░ important it s the ░░░░░░░░ one big numbers matter ░░░░░░░░ Numbers can be neglected ░░░░░░░░ people will promote new ░░░░░░░░ that are off by ░░░░░░░░ of a million they ░░░░░░░░ simply haven t run ░░░░░░░░ numbers themselves most pathetic ░░░░░░░░ of all is is ░░░░░░░░ they don t know ░░░░░░░░ they need to know ░░░░░░░░ to do that their ░░░░░░░░ of scientific knowledge allows ░░░░░░░░ a pseudoscience to promote ░░░░░░░░ I will refer to ░░░░░░░░ technocons political opportunistic aims ░░░░░░░░ are readily unmasked and ░░░░░░░░ if you simply apply ░░░░░░░░ of magnitude calculations very ░░░░░░░░ a referee must apply ░░░░░░░░ calculus based statistical methods ░░░░░░░░ with good common sense ░░░░░░░░ would also like to ░░░░░░░░ methods used by two ░░░░░░░░ my former Associates at ░░░░░░░░ of California Berkeley Nobel ░░░░░░░░ uh when they were ░░░░░░░░ data a group of ░░░░░░░░ points and told look ░░░░░░░░ trend is obvious Louis ░░░░░░░░ we don t look ░░░░░░░░ it and say flattest ░░░░░░░░ I ever saw Charlie ░░░░░░░░ would look at it ░░░░░░░░ say I don t ░░░░░░░░ in the data what ░░░░░░░░ re telling me I ░░░░░░░░ supposed to see beware ░░░░░░░░ you re doing uh ░░░░░░░░ science it may lead ░░░░░░░░ into Politically Incorrect areas ░░░░░░░░ you re a good ░░░░░░░░ you will follow them ░░░░░░░░ have several I won ░░░░░░░░ have time to discuss ░░░░░░░░ they are I can ░░░░░░░░ say there is no ░░░░░░░░ climate crisis and that ░░░░░░░░ change does not cause ░░░░░░░░ weather events thank you