Andrew Cherkasky: Biden Pardons for ‘All Crimes Known and Unknown’ Raise Legal Questions

RUSH EXCERPT:

CHERKASKY: “Well, So first the executive orders, but President Trump wants to pull back from. You can do those there’s not going to be any legal review of those are, can be quite difficult to kind of unravel, especially some of the more administrative executive orders. But when we’re talking about the pardons, I think that the only way to really test whether the pardons are or are not legally sufficient is if at some point, the administration decides to prosecute one of those people who work part and, and then that would be something that was challenged through the court system. I think it’s very difficult to support the idea that any of those pardons are completely league gl. One of the issues that I think is the most telling isn’t even the auto, an issue. It’s that the it’s that the pardon themselves with was pardoning people for all crimes known and unknown. How can a person pardon someone from a crime if they don’t even know that it was committed?? So I think that it’s not even the auto pen, but just the that nature. Her of the text alone suggests that President Biden was just engaging or his his staff was engaging in pardons that have no meaning or effect when played out in the long run.”