Kayleigh McEnany Slams FBI Bias Following Trump FBI Raid: This Just ‘Pours Fuel on that Fire’

EXCERPT:

McENANY: "Very personal for someone who the FBI was, you could argue, looking out for six years. We know about the dossier, we know the way it was peddled. We know that there was an insurance policy if you read Peter Strzok’s texts. So, all the things President Trump was saying, this just pours fuel on that fire. I will say, I think you can’t look at this in isolation. I think you have to look at this in light of other Trump-related prosecutions. What I mean by that is in this case it’s the Presidential Records Act, Jonathan Turley pointed out to Bill earlier, it’s very rarely used in the criminal context. It’s being used here. You look at Paul Manafort, who was the campaign manager for Donald Trump, this was a FARA violation they pursued, FARA has been used seven times in 50 years, but it’s brought out against Paul Manafort, this despite there being rampant FARA violations, 62% of people admitting that they report late. And then the Logan Act used against Michael Flynn, this is a 1799 statute that is never in the history of this country been used to successfully prosecute anyone, but it’s used as a pretext to go in and look at Michael Flynn. Why are never-before used statutes or rarely used statutes in those contexts being used in this manner raises questions, especially as the FBI doesn’t go out after Larry Nassar the way that they should’ve initially, especially as one-third of Portland rioter cases are dropped, you know, especially when you look at the abortion facilities that you seemly had to drag the DoJ to look into some of these inquiries. Why weren’t there raids in these contacts, but there's a raid here? It's a question."