Blumenthal to Bill Barr: Would You Defend Roe v. Wade If It Were Challenged?

‘It’s been on the books 46 years’


BLUMENTHAL: "Would you defend Roe v. Wade if it were challenged?"
BARR: "Would I defend Roe v. Wade? I mean, usually the way these — this would come up would be a state regulation of some sort and whether it’s permissible under Roe v. Wade. And I would -- I would hope that the SG would make whatever arguments are necessary to address that. I think the justices have — the recent ones have made clear that they consider Roe v. Wade an established precedent. It’s been on the books 46 years."

Video files
Audio files
Similar stories
Trump: Had Bill Barr Been Our Attorney General from the Start, None of This Would Have Happened
MSNBC’s Brian Williams Dubs AG ‘Baghdad Bill Barr’
Lindsey Graham: All the Rules Have Been Changed to Get Trump; Now They’re Trying to Destroy Bill Barr
Ro Khanna: ‘All We Want Is for Bill Barr To Be Transparent’
Limbaugh: Alicia Machado Is Exact Type of Woman Bill Clinton Would Go After