Judge Nap on Trump Tower Meeting with Russians: The President Should Be Worried About Don Jr.

covering all from the ░░░░░░░░ House for you Judge ░░░░░░░░ Napolitano thank you for ░░░░░░░░ here tonight Does a ░░░░░░░░ of stuff being thrown ░░░░░░░░ So start first with ░░░░░░░░ up pollution versus conspiracy ░░░░░░░░ are big words and ░░░░░░░░ clearly different meanings There ░░░░░░░░ no such contact as ░░░░░░░░ word collusion and the ░░░░░░░░ does not appear in ░░░░░░░░ federal statute that is ░░░░░░░░ to this case So ░░░░░░░░ and one says collusion ░░░░░░░░ not a crime and ░░░░░░░░ nobody involved in the ░░░░░░░░ Tower meeting committed a ░░░░░░░░ that s a false ░░░░░░░░ because it presumes that ░░░░░░░░ is worth investigating Since ░░░░░░░░ doesn t exist you ░░░░░░░░ analyze it So here ░░░░░░░░ what the statute prohibits ░░░░░░░░ law prohibits the receipt ░░░░░░░░ people running a campaign ░░░░░░░░ information or anything of ░░░░░░░░ from a foreign person ░░░░░░░░ or government It prohibits ░░░░░░░░ that and it prohibits ░░░░░░░░ to solicit it The ░░░░░░░░ is called a conspiracy ░░░░░░░░ agreement to do something ░░░░░░░░ So there are three ░░░░░░░░ crimes here Soliciting the ░░░░░░░░ receiving the information or ░░░░░░░░ to receive the information ░░░░░░░░ But the president made ░░░░░░░░ very clear in that ░░░░░░░░ nothing came of that ░░░░░░░░ and he didn t ░░░░░░░░ about it That s ░░░░░░░░ problem for defense lawyers ░░░░░░░░ conspiracy cases They don ░░░░░░░░ have to be successful ░░░░░░░░ the essence of the ░░░░░░░░ is the agreement not ░░░░░░░░ act that the agreement ░░░░░░░░ if you follow me ░░░░░░░░ if the people in ░░░░░░░░ Tower agreed to receive ░░░░░░░░ on Hillary from Russian ░░░░░░░░ entities or the Russian ░░░░░░░░ it doesn t matter ░░░░░░░░ they never received it ░░░░░░░░ the agreement is what ░░░░░░░░ the crime I suggest ░░░░░░░░ you that is what ░░░░░░░░ Mueller is looking at ░░░░░░░░ that s a problem ░░░░░░░░ so much for the ░░░░░░░░ but for his son ░░░░░░░░ the others who participated ░░░░░░░░ that Sandra So despite ░░░░░░░░ media frenzy if you ░░░░░░░░ well over this tweet ░░░░░░░░ is nothing new and ░░░░░░░░ the president said something ░░░░░░░░ similar before So what ░░░░░░░░ you able to conclude ░░░░░░░░ what you had seen ░░░░░░░░ the president should be ░░░░░░░░ about his son His ░░░░░░░░ testified in secret under ░░░░░░░░ to the United States ░░░░░░░░ We don t know ░░░░░░░░ that testimony was but ░░░░░░░░ he tell them what ░░░░░░░░ told the public which ░░░░░░░░ this was about Russian ░░░░░░░░ Dan Abrams make a ░░░░░░░░ point but draws a ░░░░░░░░ conclusion from it and ░░░░░░░░ is this Watch One ░░░░░░░░ the president is sticking ░░░░░░░░ right now is that ░░░░░░░░ didn t know anything ░░░░░░░░ the Trump Tower meeting ░░░░░░░░ has to stick to ░░░░░░░░ part because of he ░░░░░░░░ he knew about the ░░░░░░░░ that almost certainly means ░░░░░░░░ Donald Jr Lied in ░░░░░░░░ of Congress and I ░░░░░░░░ that that would almost ░░░░░░░░ mean that Donald junior ░░░░░░░░ get indicted I agree ░░░░░░░░ Dan if the president ░░░░░░░░ that he knew about ░░░░░░░░ meeting down the president ░░░░░░░░ something that both Ken ░░░░░░░░ and the Nixon prosecutors ░░░░░░░░ cox as that was ░░░░░░░░ impeachable offense and that ░░░░░░░░ using the instruments of ░░░░░░░░ government to lie to ░░░░░░░░ American public The instruments ░░░░░░░░ the government would be ░░░░░░░░ force one when he ░░░░░░░░ the statement saying it ░░░░░░░░ just about Russian adoptions ░░░░░░░░ the president s knowledge ░░░░░░░░ key here to drawing ░░░░░░░░ president into this but ░░░░░░░░ is not key to ░░░░░░░░ Donald junior in and ░░░░░░░░ s already in Sandra ░░░░░░░░ Andrew Napolitano thanks for ░░░░░░░░ here tonight.