Nano Tech CEO: Russia Is Mexico with Nukes

RUSH TRANSCRIPT Tucker China ░░░░░░░░ proven to be a ░░░░░░░░ more formidable adversary than ░░░░░░░░ over the past three ░░░░░░░░ Congress finally seems to ░░░░░░░░ taking notice of that ░░░░░░░░ the house intelligence committee ░░░░░░░░ a hearing on Chinese ░░░░░░░░ and how it threatens ░░░░░░░░ actors and the U ░░░░░░░░ Government James Phillips as ░░░░░░░░ and CEO of nano ░░░░░░░░ thanks you for coming ░░░░░░░░ You run a high ░░░░░░░░ manufacturing company in the ░░░░░░░░ States that makes a ░░░░░░░░ of different things some ░░░░░░░░ them for the U ░░░░░░░░ Government Tell us how ░░░░░░░░ have experienced the threat ░░░░░░░░ China to our private ░░░░░░░░ We are a deep ░░░░░░░░ manufacturer we make things ░░░░░░░░ one else can make ░░░░░░░░ the world One day ░░░░░░░░ FBI showed up at ░░░░░░░░ door and said you ░░░░░░░░ the most hit firewall ░░░░░░░░ this other southern United ░░░░░░░░ by China and you ░░░░░░░░ to look out for ░░░░░░░░ If there s a ░░░░░░░░ under the Bush Administration ░░░░░░░░ protect nano because it ░░░░░░░░ so important to the ░░░░░░░░ S It undergirds all ░░░░░░░░ manufacturing a discrete try ░░░░░░░░ reclaim manufacturing it all ░░░░░░░░ with nano It doesn ░░░░░░░░ matter whether it s ░░░░░░░░ nano scientists somewhere there ░░░░░░░░ needs to be protected ░░░░░░░░ caught us by surprise ░░░░░░░░ luckily we already had ░░░░░░░░ firewalls At the end ░░░░░░░░ the day after looking ░░░░░░░░ it they said as ░░░░░░░░ as we have helped ░░░░░░░░ now protect and turn ░░░░░░░░ my entire firewall to ░░░░░░░░ FBI and they still ░░░░░░░░ it and to that ░░░░░░░░ it s protected You ░░░░░░░░ have to go and ░░░░░░░░ everything on your logbooks ░░░░░░░░ you really want to ░░░░░░░░ your secret stuff If ░░░░░░░░ re coming up with ░░░░░░░░ resistant materials to make ░░░░░░░░ that are really futuristic ░░░░░░░░ not put that on ░░░░░░░░ grid You go back ░░░░░░░░ time Tucker Is there ░░░░░░░░ country that approaches China ░░░░░░░░ the scale of its ░░░░░░░░ and aggression PHILLIPS We ░░░░░░░░ Russia Russia Russia Russia ░░░░░░░░ great extent is Mexico ░░░░░░░░ nukes They ve got ░░░░░░░░ small GDP China realizes ░░░░░░░░ way to take over ░░░░░░░░ world the way to ░░░░░░░░ over the United States ░░░░░░░░ be the number one ░░░░░░░░ in the world in ░░░░░░░░ respects is through innovation ░░░░░░░░ science the fastest growing ░░░░░░░░ in the world It ░░░░░░░░ true no different than ░░░░░░░░ did 100 years ago ░░░░░░░░ person with the most ░░░░░░░░ is in charge Tucker ░░░░░░░░ with nukes I wish ░░░░░░░░ would have told that ░░░░░░░░ that was really interesting ░░░░░░░░ Mueller s investigation continues ░░░░░░░░ widen in its thus ░░░░░░░░ unsuccessful quest to find ░░░░░░░░ collusion with in 2016 ░░░░░░░░ the molar team took ░░░░░░░░ of his communications Eric ░░░░░░░░ joins us tonight of ░░░░░░░░ recap of what happened ░░░░░░░░ a lot for coming ░░░░░░░░ Why would they take ░░░░░░░░ of your communications devices ░░░░░░░░ s that about It ░░░░░░░░ all part of their ░░░░░░░░ This was many months ░░░░░░░░ and I haven t ░░░░░░░░ anything of them for ░░░░░░░░ I would assume their ░░░░░░░░ in me has long ░░░░░░░░ Tucker Have you received ░░░░░░░░ devices back Yes I ░░░░░░░░ them back within a ░░░░░░░░ of days Tucker Is ░░░░░░░░ any suggestion that they ░░░░░░░░ you colluded with Russia ░░░░░░░░ some way way No ░░░░░░░░ not Tucker I want ░░░░░░░░ talk to you also ░░░░░░░░ I ve been emailing ░░░░░░░░ you about this I ░░░░░░░░ you re a legitimate ░░░░░░░░ on the question of ░░░░░░░░ It s a war ░░░░░░░░ occupation that gets very ░░░░░░░░ attention I m interested ░░░░░░░░ know how you think ░░░░░░░░ should proceed because you ░░░░░░░░ deep knowledge of that ░░░░░░░░ This year we are ░░░░░░░░ as a country more ░░░░░░░░ the entire U K ░░░░░░░░ budget or more than ░░░░░░░░ entire Department of Homeland ░░░░░░░░ 62 billion in Afghanistan ░░░░░░░░ are still dying there ░░░░░░░░ that were infants when ░░░░░░░░ twin towers came down ░░░░░░░░ we are entering a ░░░░░░░░ war which is a ░░░░░░░░ for America The more ░░░░░░░░ America puts on Iran ░░░░░░░░ means the more that ░░░░░░░░ will continue to subvert ░░░░░░░░ legitimate government in Afghanistan ░░░░░░░░ should take a smaller ░░░░░░░░ approach just like the ░░░░░░░░ S Went into Afghanistan ░░░░░░░░ white after 9 11 ░░░░░░░░ problem is within months ░░░░░░░░ that we switched to ░░░░░░░░ very conventional approach like ░░░░░░░░ Soviet Union did and ░░░░░░░░ spend going backwards ever ░░░░░░░░ having spent trillions of ░░░░░░░░ and we ve lost ░░░░░░░░ of Americans We go ░░░░░░░░ a small special operations ░░░░░░░░ with some contracted presence ░░░░░░░░ Right now there are ░░░░░░░░ 000 U S Forces ░░░░░░░░ another 30 000 contractors ░░░░░░░░ plan takes it down ░░░░░░░░ 2 000 U S ░░░░░░░░ and 6 000 contractors ░░░░░░░░ a significant savings more ░░░░░░░░ 50 billion of savings ░░░░░░░░ money even in Washington ░░░░░░░░ would put us on ░░░░░░░░ very sustainable path to ░░░░░░░░ the Taliban and the ░░░░░░░░ is forces that there.