Current Time 0:00
Duration -:-
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -:-
 
1x
  • Chapters
  • descriptions off, selected
  • captions off, selected
    To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
           
    Date
    Summary
    Schumer: Rand Paul’s a Hypocrite for Attacking Spending Bill While Supporting Tax Cuts (clip)
    Source
    C-SPAN2

    Name: C-SPAN2

    URL: https://www.c-span.org/live/?channel=c-span-2

    Show
    Persons
    Chuck Schumer

    Name: Chuck Schumer

    Employment: U.S. Senate

    Position: Senator

    Event location
    University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.

    Name: University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.

    URL: http://louisville.edu/

    Link
    Uploaded
    02/13/2018 10:45 am
    Owner
    Type
    Audio
    Format
    MP3 Use clipper to adjust file type
    Duration
    0:02:20
    Views
    0
    Purchases
    0
    Transcript
    REPORTER How do you ░░░░░░░░ to Senator Rand Paul ░░░░░░░░ comments that bipartisanship that ░░░░░░░░ spending both foreign and ░░░░░░░░ is not the kind ░░░░░░░░ bipartisanship we need Schumer ░░░░░░░░ I ll be candid ░░░░░░░░ I think Rand Paul ░░░░░░░░ a very fine man ░░░░░░░░ I think his beliefs ░░░░░░░░ genuine and sincere and ░░░░░░░░ has a large amount ░░░░░░░░ courage to go forward ░░░░░░░░ no one else will ░░░░░░░░ his idea of railing ░░░░░░░░ the deficit on this ░░░░░░░░ deal after he supported ░░░░░░░░ 1 5 trillion increase ░░░░░░░░ the deficit for tax ░░░░░░░░ 80 percent of which ░░░░░░░░ the calculations that I ░░░░░░░░ seen are aimed at ░░░░░░░░ top one percent ring ░░░░░░░░ hollow Had Rand Paul ░░░░░░░░ against that tax bill ░░░░░░░░ it would increase the ░░░░░░░░ by such a large ░░░░░░░░ he would have every ░░░░░░░░ he still has the ░░░░░░░░ but he would have ░░░░░░░░ benefit of the argument ░░░░░░░░ he stood on the ░░░░░░░░ and railed against this ░░░░░░░░ which increased the deficit ░░░░░░░░ by another 300 billion ░░░░░░░░ you can t if ░░░░░░░░ re a deficit hawk ░░░░░░░░ ve got to be ░░░░░░░░ deficit hawk all the ░░░░░░░░ through You can t ░░░░░░░░ pick an issue and ░░░░░░░░ I m a deficit ░░░░░░░░ on the military but ░░░░░░░░ on domestic spending or ░░░░░░░░ versa Or I m ░░░░░░░░ deficit hawk on government ░░░░░░░░ but not on taxes ░░░░░░░░ side has its rationale ░░░░░░░░ who are for tax ░░░░░░░░ say the economy is ░░░░░░░░ to grow and create ░░░░░░░░ and there will not ░░░░░░░░ a deficit Most economists ░░░░░░░░ conservative economists don t ░░░░░░░░ that On the liberal ░░░░░░░░ people say increased funding ░░░░░░░░ education and infrastructure and ░░░░░░░░ will create growth and ░░░░░░░░ won t have a ░░░░░░░░ Both of those arguments ░░░░░░░░ believe more in the ░░░░░░░░ than the other obviously ░░░░░░░░ both of those arguments ░░░░░░░░ undercut any ability to ░░░░░░░░ the deficit down And ░░░░░░░░ get the deficit down ░░░░░░░░ for both sides to ░░░░░░░░ the deficit down each ░░░░░░░░ can t say I ░░░░░░░░ a deficit hawk on ░░░░░░░░ issue but not that ░░░░░░░░ if we re going ░░░░░░░░ get the deficit down ░░░░░░░░ you very much everybody ░░░░░░░░ much appreciated.”
    To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.