To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
         
Date
Summary
Johnson on Bill’s Provision to Eliminate Tax on Gun Silencers: The Gov’t Shouldn’t Make Money on a Alienable Right
Source
X (Formerly Twitter)

Name: X (Formerly Twitter)

URL: https://twitter.com/

Show
Persons
Jon Karl/Jonathan Karl

Name: Jon Karl/Jonathan Karl

Employment: ABC News

Position: Senior political correspondent

, Mike Johnson

Name: Mike Johnson

Employment: U.S. Congress

Position: U.S. Representative

Event
Event location
Uploaded
06/08/2025 11:17 am
Owner
Elizabeth (staff)
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1280x720) Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:02:10
Views
3
Purchases
1
Social views
0
Transcript
RUSH TRANSCRIPT Karl Let ░░░░░░░░ ask you about a ░░░░░░░░ other provisions that caught ░░░░░░░░ eye One there is ░░░░░░░░ provision that eliminates attacks ░░░░░░░░ gun silencers Now this ░░░░░░░░ a tax on the ░░░░░░░░ for about 100 years ░░░░░░░░ are you cutting a ░░░░░░░░ on silencers Johnson There ░░░░░░░░ a lot of thought ░░░░░░░░ deliberation that went into ░░░░░░░░ as well The Second ░░░░░░░░ is a critical freedom ░░░░░░░░ the Constitution and there ░░░░░░░░ no real Rationale for ░░░░░░░░ taxes on these pieces ░░░░░░░░ equipment And we have ░░░░░░░░ votes to do it ░░░░░░░░ think it was a ░░░░░░░░ time overdue I think ░░░░░░░░ have to protect the ░░░░░░░░ freedoms of the American ░░░░░░░░ There s no Rationale ░░░░░░░░ government should not be ░░░░░░░░ money on something you ░░░░░░░░ a fundamental and alienable ░░░░░░░░ to Karl What about ░░░░░░░░ beds It eliminates a ░░░░░░░░ tax on tanning beds ░░░░░░░░ did that become a ░░░░░░░░ Johnson Well look I ░░░░░░░░ that was an unfair ░░░░░░░░ that the Biden Administration ░░░░░░░░ on an industry because ░░░░░░░░ decided Karl It goes ░░░░░░░░ to 2010 Johnson But ░░░░░░░░ Biden Administration enhanced it ░░░░░░░░ will be modifications on ░░░░░░░░ in the final package ░░░░░░░░ We ll see how ░░░░░░░░ comes out Karl This ░░░░░░░░ adds another 4 trillion ░░░░░░░░ the debt ceiling Donald ░░░░░░░░ came out this week ░░░░░░░░ m sure you saw ░░░░░░░░ it s not the ░░░░░░░░ time he said this ░░░░░░░░ eliminate the debt ceiling ░░░░░░░░ with Elizabeth Warren on ░░░░░░░░ question What do you ░░░░░░░░ that have Johnson He ░░░░░░░░ this as an arbitrary ░░░░░░░░ that puts pressure on ░░░░░░░░ and the White House ░░░░░░░░ up every few years ░░░░░░░░ we have to extend ░░░░░░░░ debt ceiling What s ░░░░░░░░ important about President Trump ░░░░░░░░ his difference with Elizabeth ░░░░░░░░ he has no intention ░░░░░░░░ spending higher levels We ░░░░░░░░ in the process of ░░░░░░░░ The big beautiful bill ░░░░░░░░ This is adding to ░░░░░░░░ national debt Johnson No ░░░░░░░░ s not No Karl ░░░░░░░░ is Johnson The cbo ░░░░░░░░ arguing if we extend ░░░░░░░░ make permanent existing tax ░░░░░░░░ that s going to ░░░░░░░░ to the deficit What ░░░░░░░░ re doing in this ░░░░░░░░ is cutting 1 6 ░░░░░░░░ of spending government spending ░░░░░░░░ creates the deficits We ░░░░░░░░ going to reduce the ░░░░░░░░
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.