♪
>> Todd the DoJ s ░░░░░░░░ trial against Google resuming ░░░░░░░░ week and the Wall ░░░░░░░░ Journal on the cases ░░░░░░░░ quote competition solves market ░░░░░░░░ better than regulators who ░░░░░░░░ measuring monopoly by market ░░░░░░░░ evolve faster than bureaucracy ░░░░░░░░ keep up Carley Andrew ░░░░░░░░ joins us now Chairman ░░░░░░░░ morning to you Thank ░░░░░░░░ so much for joining ░░░░░░░░ Is as I m ░░░░░░░░ you saw the Wall ░░░░░░░░ Journal editorial board is ░░░░░░░░ of what you are ░░░░░░░░ to do in these ░░░░░░░░ cases against Google and ░░░░░░░░ say they stymie innovation ░░░░░░░░ what you are trying ░░░░░░░░ do here and your ░░░░░░░░ to the editorial board ░░░░░░░░ Good morning Thank you ░░░░░░░░ having me I think ░░░░░░░░ called it the China ░░░░░░░░ Wall Street Journal yesterday ░░░░░░░░ I think he is ░░░░░░░░ Competition is better for ░░░░░░░░ than regulation But antitrust ░░░░░░░░ is how protect competition ░░░░░░░░ is what makes America ░░░░░░░░ and antitrust is the ░░░░░░░░ that makes sure American ░░░░░░░░ and American markets remain ░░░░░░░░ That s what the ░░░░░░░░ case is about It ░░░░░░░░ about making sure that ░░░░░░░░ companies with tremendous power ░░░░░░░░ on the merits rather ░░░░░░░░ buying up competitors You ░░░░░░░░ we want competition We ░░░░░░░░ growth Competition is how ░░░░░░░░ achieve innovation and that ░░░░░░░░ what the case is ░░░░░░░░ It s about making ░░░░░░░░ search competing on the ░░░░░░░░ which protects all Americans ░░░░░░░░ helps us all flourish ░░░░░░░░ how do you navigate ░░░░░░░░ balance wanting free market ░░░░░░░░ to take hold versus ░░░░░░░░ need to regulate as ░░░░░░░░ your role as a ░░░░░░░░ Yeah It s a ░░░░░░░░ question So free markets ░░░░░░░░ the best thing that ░░░░░░░░ have you know to ░░░░░░░░ resources Free markets are ░░░░░░░░ what allow you know ░░░░░░░░ Americans to pull themselves ░░░░░░░░ by their boot straps ░░░░░░░░ achieve That s part ░░░░░░░░ the American dream And ░░░░░░░░ don t think regulation ░░░░░░░░ good Antitrust enforcement isn ░░░░░░░░ regulation The last four ░░░░░░░░ the previous administration they ░░░░░░░░ all about rules rules ░░░░░░░░ F anti regulation was ░░░░░░░░ name of the game ░░░░░░░░ s not what we ░░░░░░░░ about in the Trump ░░░░░░░░ President Trump has prime ░░░░░░░░ milled to regulate and ░░░░░░░░ he delivering at the ░░░░░░░░ we are leading one ░░░░░░░░ the major deregulatory campaigns ░░░░░░░░ eliminating anticompetitive regulation Antitrust ░░░░░░░░ isn t regulation it ░░░░░░░░ just law enforcement Congress ░░░░░░░░ written the antitrust laws ░░░░░░░░ assigned the FTC and ░░░░░░░░ DoJ to be a ░░░░░░░░ on the beat and ░░░░░░░░ sure that everyone is ░░░░░░░░ by the competition rules ░░░░░░░░ if someone isn t ░░░░░░░░ FTC is going to ░░░░░░░░ to court Other than ░░░░░░░░ the FTC needs to ░░░░░░░░ out of the way ░░░░░░░░ let our markets grow ░░░░░░░░ s why we are ░░░░░░░░ President Trump s deregulatory ░░░░░░░░ by leading anticompetitive regulation ░░░░░░░░ insulate monopolies through the ░░░░░░░░ of government power Carley ░░░░░░░░ FTC announced lawsuit against ░░░░░░░░ Saying we are disappointed ░░░░░░░░ the FTC chose to ░░░░░░░░ forward with this action ░░░░░░░░ confident that the courts ░░░░░░░░ agree with what we ░░░░░░░░ know Uber wants sign ░░░░░░░░ and cancellation processes clear ░░░░░░░░ and follow the letter ░░░░░░░░ of the law For ░░░░░░░░ not following this one ░░░░░░░░ you explain this case ░░░░░░░░ Sure Congress passed a ░░░░░░░░ called the restore online ░░░░░░░░ confidence act Making sure ░░░░░░░░ with online subscriptions treat ░░░░░░░░ fairly both when they ░░░░░░░░ up by making it ░░░░░░░░ clear and conspicuous what ░░░░░░░░ agreeing to when they ░░░░░░░░ up and requiring a ░░░░░░░░ method of online cancellation ░░░░░░░░ online subscriptions One of ░░░░░░░░ most important laws the ░░░░░░░░ has passed the last ░░░░░░░░ and a half shop ░░░░░░░░ All about fairness We ░░░░░░░░ FTC investigated uber for ░░░░░░░░ long time and concluded ░░░░░░░░ the sign up method ░░░░░░░░ the cancellation method wasn ░░░░░░░░ consistent with the laws ░░░░░░░░ Congress passed that is ░░░░░░░░ has taken uber to ░░░░░░░░ This isn t a ░░░░░░░░ against Big Tech All ░░░░░░░░ spend a lot of ░░░░░░░░ online as shoppers participating ░░░░░░░░ online commerce The FTC ░░░░░░░░ job is to protect ░░░░░░░░ and meets consumers where ░░░░░░░░ are And because consumers ░░░░░░░░ a lot of time ░░░░░░░░ with subscriptions it s ░░░░░░░░ that the FTC enforce ░░░░░░░░ law that s designed ░░░░░░░░ protected shoppers online That ░░░░░░░░ what the suit against ░░░░░░░░ is all about Just ░░░░░░░░ sure that online subscription ░░░░░░░░ like uber are treating ░░░░░░░░ consumers fairly Carley we ░░░░░░░░ approaching the first 100 ░░░░░░░░ I m sure this ░░░░░░░░ of time has been ░░░░░░░░ whirlwind for you You ░░░░░░░░ getting a lot of ░░░░░░░░ done We thank you ░░░░░░░░ much for joining