Jonathan Turley on Abrego Garcia’s Case: The Supreme Court Said ‘You Have to Facilitate’ But They Didn’t Define What that Means

BREAM Let s start ░░░░░░░░ that Garcia case Okay ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court there ░░░░░░░░ this big argument about ░░░░░░░░ they said in their ░░░░░░░░ about getting him back ░░░░░░░░ defer to the district ░░░░░░░░ saying All right there ░░░░░░░░ language there to facilitate ░░░░░░░░ effectuate getting him back ░░░░░░░░ they said this The ░░░░░░░░ scope of the term ░░░░░░░░ in the District Court ░░░░░░░░ order is unclear may ░░░░░░░░ the District Court s ░░░░░░░░ The District Court should ░░░░░░░░ its directive with due ░░░░░░░░ for the deference owed ░░░░░░░░ the executive Branch in ░░░░░░░░ conduct of foreign affairs ░░░░░░░░ Trump Administration is saying ░░░░░░░░ means essentially we don ░░░░░░░░ have to do everything ░░░░░░░░ our power to try ░░░░░░░░ get him back TURLEY ░░░░░░░░ The Trump Administration is ░░░░░░░░ a pretty artificially narrow ░░░░░░░░ They re saying that ░░░░░░░░ they bring him to ░░░░░░░░ doorstep we have to ░░░░░░░░ the door The District ░░░░░░░░ clearly disagrees and basically ░░░░░░░░ I feel UN facilitated ░░░░░░░░ this is the problem ░░░░░░░░ what the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ You can get a ░░░░░░░░ decision if no one ░░░░░░░░ agree what you said ░░░░░░░░ they said You have ░░░░░░░░ facilitate but they didn ░░░░░░░░ define what that means ░░░░░░░░ the same time the ░░░░░░░░ that the judge has ░░░░░░░░ to the executive Branch ░░░░░░░░ not been robust and ░░░░░░░░ Trump Administration is saying ░░░░░░░░ they clearly said that ░░░░░░░░ have a foreign policy ░░░░░░░░ here and you cannot ░░░░░░░░ us to bring an ░░░░░░░░ Salvadoran who s in ░░░░░░░░ Salvadoran prison back to ░░░░░░░░ United States unless El ░░░░░░░░ agrees and they don ░░░░░░░░ BREAM So the District ░░░░░░░░ has said Listen I ░░░░░░░░ to know an accounting ░░░░░░░░ what you re doing ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court has told ░░░░░░░░ you have to work ░░░░░░░░ getting this guy back ░░░░░░░░ then the Trump Administration ░░░░░░░░ to the Fourth Circuit ░░░░░░░░ is not known as ░░░░░░░░ super left wing crazy ░░░░░░░░ and this is what ░░░░░░░░ Fourth Circuit said The ░░░░░░░░ is asserting a right ░░░░░░░░ stash away residents of ░░░░░░░░ country in foreign prisons ░░░░░░░░ the semblance of due ░░░░░░░░ that is the foundation ░░░░░░░░ our constitutional order to ░░░░░░░░ shocking Not only to ░░░░░░░░ but to the intuitive ░░░░░░░░ of liberty that Americans ░░░░░░░░ removed from courthouses still ░░░░░░░░ there Again they were ░░░░░░░░ the word resident not ░░░░░░░░ because this person does ░░░░░░░░ have legal protection DUPREE ░░░░░░░░ s true And the ░░░░░░░░ you just quoted were ░░░░░░░░ one of the more ░░░░░░░░ judges on the Fourth ░░░░░░░░ Judge Jay Wilkinson who ░░░░░░░░ well known very respected ░░░░░░░░ what was interesting in ░░░░░░░░ opinion is that he ░░░░░░░░ look the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ it did tell the ░░░░░░░░ judge that you have ░░░░░░░░ be respectful of the ░░░░░░░░ s prerogatives the executive ░░░░░░░░ right to conduct foreign ░░░░░░░░ and supervise immigration But ░░░░░░░░ the same time the ░░░░░░░░ Branch needs to be ░░░░░░░░ of court orders and ░░░░░░░░ of the judiciary And ░░░░░░░░ think actually you kind ░░░░░░░░ hit the soaring prose ░░░░░░░░ of his opinion where ░░░░░░░░ basically said We all ░░░░░░░░ to get along to ░░░░░░░░ our system work All ░░░░░░░░ all branches of the ░░░░░░░░ need to respect one ░░░░░░░░ and work together to ░░░░░░░░ this right BREAM Not ░░░░░░░░ working together on a ░░░░░░░░ lot at the moment ░░░░░░░░ Laughter DUPREE To say ░░░░░░░░ least To say the ░░░░░░░░