David Urban: Laura Loomer Has Trump’s ‘Best Interest in Mind’

RUSH TRANSCRIPT You know ░░░░░░░░ what do you make ░░░░░░░░ that though that that ░░░░░░░░ be who would be ░░░░░░░░ to get in and ░░░░░░░░ that argument and that ░░░░░░░░ Loomer is talking about ░░░░░░░░ s disloyal What I ░░░░░░░░ t know what loyalty ░░░░░░░░ disloyalty means in the ░░░░░░░░ of the messenger here ░░░░░░░░ So listen I don ░░░░░░░░ agree with Laura Loomer ░░░░░░░░ much but she does ░░░░░░░░ I do give her ░░░░░░░░ in one part in ░░░░░░░░ regard that she does ░░░░░░░░ the president s best ░░░░░░░░ in mind and in ░░░░░░░░ of ways And that ░░░░░░░░ why he he listens ░░░░░░░░ her times As you ░░░░░░░░ the clip he said ░░░░░░░░ listened to a lot ░░░░░░░░ people I don t ░░░░░░░░ do what they say ░░░░░░░░ I do I do ░░░░░░░░ advice and listen to ░░░░░░░░ of different folks And ░░░░░░░░ I don t disagree ░░░░░░░░ Margaret that this is ░░░░░░░░ is emblematic of a ░░░░░░░░ larger war that s ░░░░░░░░ waged inside the administration ░░░░░░░░ inside the nsc Specifically ░░░░░░░░ you look at Laura ░░░░░░░░ posts if she did ░░░░░░░░ any Sway she would ░░░░░░░░ Alex wong would have ░░░░░░░░ bounced out of there ░░░░░░░░ because she s he ░░░░░░░░ target number one for ░░░░░░░░ her And so I ░░░░░░░░ have suspected that And ░░░░░░░░ interesting the reporting that ░░░░░░░░ susie was there because ░░░░░░░░ gets in the Oval ░░░░░░░░ without susie wiles permission ░░░░░░░░ her assent And so ░░░░░░░░ know as Margaret says ░░░░░░░░ is this is emblematic ░░░░░░░░ a larger war taking ░░░░░░░░ And the three staffers ░░░░░░░░ got bounced are people ░░░░░░░░ if you looked at ░░░░░░░░ resumes don t appear ░░░░░░░░ be particularly globalists or ░░░░░░░░ was Mike waltz former ░░░░░░░░ director who was working ░░░░░░░░ the nsc in a ░░░░░░░░ a legislative affairs capacity ░░░░░░░░ one was the professional ░░░░░░░░ member who was the ░░░░░░░░ director of the Senate ░░░░░░░░ intelligence committee For many ░░░░░░░░ years He had worked ░░░░░░░░ Rubio years and years ░░░░░░░░ years ago But for ░░░░░░░░ the past you know ░░░░░░░░ years he s been ░░░░░░░░ as a professional staff ░░░░░░░░ in the Senate And ░░░░░░░░ the only one I ░░░░░░░░ really point to is ░░░░░░░░ some sort of maybe ░░░░░░░░ state ties would have ░░░░░░░░ Doug feith s son ░░░░░░░░ you know Doug feith ░░░░░░░░ the Cheney world and ░░░░░░░░ that s the only ░░░░░░░░ I could really point ░░░░░░░░ saying you know that ░░░░░░░░ could really clearly say ░░░░░░░░ would have some issues ░░░░░░░░ you know Margaret s ░░░░░░░░ that there s there ░░░░░░░░ clearly a bigger war ░░░░░░░░ on here And what ░░░░░░░░ also interesting to me ░░░░░░░░ that this this this ░░░░░░░░ had faded from the ░░░░░░░░ pages Right It had ░░░░░░░░ gone It was gone ░░░░░░░░ waltz the signal gate ░░░░░░░░ re part You re ░░░░░░░░ correct It kind of ░░░░░░░░ And so this is ░░░░░░░░ not a part of ░░░░░░░░ but part of something ░░░░░░░░ perhaps But you know ░░░░░░░░ and I understand what ░░░░░░░░ of you are saying ░░░░░░░░ maybe you know you ░░░░░░░░ you know criticize me ░░░░░░░░ coming back on this ░░░░░░░░ I will say I ░░░░░░░░ t get over the ░░░░░░░░ and I can t ░░░░░░░░ over the fact that ░░░░░░░░ is okay with this ░░░░░░░░ David I mean let ░░░░░░░░ just go through Laura ░░░░░░░░ Okay She suggested 9 ░░░░░░░░ was an inside job ░░░░░░░░ has questioned whether school ░░░░░░░░ are real She posted ░░░░░░░░ and I m not ░░░░░░░░ you re defending what ░░░░░░░░ posted I m just ░░░░░░░░ a point to everybody ░░░░░░░░ She s done Have ░░░░░░░░ noticed there s always ░░░░░░░░ school shooting in a ░░░░░░░░ state or caucus state ░░░░░░░░ before an election She ░░░░░░░░ about Kamala Harris saying ░░░░░░░░ she was elected the ░░░░░░░░ House will smell like ░░░░░░░░ Marjorie Taylor Greene denounced ░░░░░░░░ So So I come ░░░░░░░░ to all of this ░░░░░░░░ you can t take ░░░░░░░░ dressing away from the ░░░░░░░░ Margaret No that s ░░░░░░░░ that s right Look ░░░░░░░░ mean it s interesting ░░░░░░░░ says well you know ░░░░░░░░ s interesting Nobody gets ░░░░░░░░ the front door without ░░░░░░░░ wiles blessing it But ░░░░░░░░ wiles also stacked that ░░░░░░░░ with howard lutnick who ░░░░░░░░ know lost more people ░░░░░░░░ 9 11 in his ░░░░░░░░ than than anybody else ░░░░░░░░ lost business And his ░░░░░░░░ died in 9 11 ░░░░░░░░ maybe susie wiles is ░░░░░░░░ to stack a meeting ░░░░░░░░ of people Look the ░░░░░░░░ invites people in He ░░░░░░░░ these relationships with conspiracy ░░░░░░░░ He listens to the ░░░░░░░░ theorists He likes to ░░░░░░░░ to the conspiracy theorists ░░░░░░░░ he likes to listen ░░░░░░░░ everyone So this Is ░░░░░░░░ coming from the top ░░░░░░░░ suspect not from you ░░░░░░░░ and I suspect she ░░░░░░░░ like a useful idiot ░░░░░░░░ the for the restrainer ░░░░░░░░ that wants to get ░░░░░░░░ of Alex wong and ░░░░░░░░ else The problem is ░░░░░░░░ don t know that ░░░░░░░░ president understands that these ░░░░░░░░ are undermining his first ░░░░░░░░ legacy his first term ░░░░░░░░ in foreign policy is ░░░░░░░░ marked by the successes ░░░░░░░░ that crowd And here ░░░░░░░░ are coming in and ░░░░░░░░ it So David though ░░░░░░░░ it are you concerned ░░░░░░░░ people who would want ░░░░░░░░ get rid of these ░░░░░░░░ in this internecine warfare ░░░░░░░░ s going on felt ░░░░░░░░ their best foot forward ░░░░░░░░ get Trump to listen ░░░░░░░░ them was to send ░░░░░░░░ Laura Loomer No listen ░░░░░░░░ agree with Margaret I ░░░░░░░░ not sure that she ░░░░░░░░ know the message would ░░░░░░░░ gotten to the president ░░░░░░░░ of whom the messenger ░░░░░░░░ I think that you ░░░░░░░░ I do I am ░░░░░░░░ bit concerned about you ░░░░░░░░ one faction winning out ░░░░░░░░ another faction I do ░░░░░░░░ it s healthy to ░░░░░░░░ debate I do like ░░░░░░░░ waltz I think he ░░░░░░░░ a very talented guy ░░░░░░░░ think his view of ░░░░░░░░ world is a view ░░░░░░░░ I share And you ░░░░░░░░ I think that NATO ░░░░░░░░ a useful alliance I ░░░░░░░░ you know like Margaret ░░░░░░░░ maybe I m a ░░░░░░░░ or whatever Whatever term ░░░░░░░░ used earlier Margaret but ░░░░░░░░ believe it s healthy ░░░░░░░░ have That kind of ░░░░░░░░ friedman Yeah There you ░░░░░░░░ I believe it s ░░░░░░░░ to have that kind ░░░░░░░░ debate inside the White ░░░░░░░░ And that s what ░░░░░░░░ re supposed to have ░░░░░░░░ the national Security Council ░░░░░░░░ Mike waltz should be ░░░░░░░░ to have those kind ░░░░░░░░ open discussions and open ░░░░░░░░ in the White House ░░░░░░░░ a you know a ░░░░░░░░ point points of views ░░░░░░░░ so by eliminating people ░░░░░░░░ want to have that ░░░░░░░░ think it s just ░░░░░░░░ for it s bad ░░░░░░░░ this administration And I ░░░░░░░░ know I d wish ░░░░░░░░ that not occur I ░░░░░░░░ wish there d be ░░░░░░░░ divergent views presented than ░░░░░░░░ less.