Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Compares Bans on Sex Changes for Kids to Bans on Interracial Marriage

BROWN Jackson being drawn ░░░░░░░░ the statute That was ░░░░░░░░ of like the starting ░░░░░░░░ The question was whether ░░░░░░░░ was discriminatory because it ░░░░░░░░ to both races and ░░░░░░░░ wasn t necessarily invidious ░░░░░░░░ whatever But you know ░░░░░░░░ I read the statute ░░░░░░░░ excuse me the case ░░░░░░░░ you know the court ░░░░░░░░ off by saying that ░░░░░░░░ is now one of ░░░░░░░░ states which prohibit and ░░░░░░░░ marriages on the basis ░░░░░░░░ racial classifications And when ░░░░░░░░ look at the structure ░░░░░░░░ that law it looks ░░░░░░░░ terms of you know ░░░░░░░░ can t do something ░░░░░░░░ is inconsistent with your ░░░░░░░░ characteristics It s sort ░░░░░░░░ the same thing So ░░░░░░░░ s interesting to me ░░░░░░░░ we now have this ░░░░░░░░ argument and I wonder ░░░░░░░░ Virginia could have gotten ░░░░░░░░ with what they did ░░░░░░░░ by just making a ░░░░░░░░ argument the way that ░░░░░░░░ is in this case ░░░░░░░░ Yes I think that ░░░░░░░░ exactly right that there ░░░░░░░░ absolutely a parallel between ░░░░░░░░ law that says you ░░░░░░░░ t act inconsistent with ░░░░░░░░ protected characteristic And in ░░░░░░░░ other —“