Current Time 0:00
Duration -:-
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -:-
 
1x
  • Chapters
  • descriptions off, selected
  • captions off, selected
    To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
      G      
    Date
    Summary
    Vance on 2020 Election Case: ‘Trump’s Lawyers Want the Entire Indictment to Be Thrown Out’
    Source
    MSNBC

    Name: MSNBC

    URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

    Show
    The Saturday Show with Jonathan Capehart

    Name: The Saturday Show with Jonathan Capehart

    URL: https://www.msnbc.com/sunday-show

    Persons
    Joyce Vance

    Name: Joyce Vance

    Employment: University of Alabama

    Position: Professor

    , Charles Coleman Jr.

    Name: Charles Coleman Jr.

    Position: Attorney

    Event
    Event location
    Link
    Uploaded
    09/01/2024 05:48 am
    Owner
    Yahya (staff)
    Type
    Video
    Format
    MP4 (720x406) Use clipper to adjust file type
    Duration
    0:01:26
    Views
    2
    Purchases
    2
    Transcript
    RUSH TRANSCRIPT COLEMAN JR ░░░░░░░░ can anticipate a significant ░░░░░░░░ of back and forth ░░░░░░░░ Trump s attorneys arguing ░░░░░░░░ a very very broad ░░░░░░░░ of the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ ruling and then obviously ░░░░░░░░ Smith looking to be ░░░░░░░░ as possible and how ░░░░░░░░ is done If you ░░░░░░░░ in the driver s ░░░░░░░░ and you re looking ░░░░░░░░ this objectively how good ░░░░░░░░ you feel about what ░░░░░░░░ remain of all of ░░░░░░░░ indictments if the Supreme ░░░░░░░░ decision is broadly applied ░░░░░░░░ way that Trump lawyers ░░░░░░░░ going to seek to ░░░░░░░░ it done Vance Well ░░░░░░░░ Trump s lawyers want ░░░░░░░░ entire indictment to be ░░░░░░░░ out It s unlikely ░░░░░░░░ that will be the ░░░░░░░░ and even the Supreme ░░░░░░░░ did not go that ░░░░░░░░ when they wrote this ░░░░░░░░ Because there s a ░░░░░░░░ of conduct involved in ░░░░░░░░ indictment that is personal ░░░░░░░░ it s the conduct ░░░░░░░░ candidate Trump not President ░░░░░░░░ Where the lines will ░░░░░░░░ to be drawn though ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court as ░░░░░░░░ know we discussed this ░░░░░░░░ they didn t really ░░░░░░░░ a test for Judge ░░░░░░░░ to use in deciding ░░░░░░░░ the dividing line between ░░░░░░░░ and unofficial conduct is ░░░░░░░░ perhaps more importantly when ░░░░░░░░ presumption against indicting or ░░░░░░░░ official conduct when that ░░░░░░░░ can be overcome She ░░░░░░░░ take the first cut ░░░░░░░░ that but it s ░░░░░░░░ clear that there will ░░░░░░░░ another round of appeals ░░░░░░░░ engage in oversight over ░░░░░░░░ decisions that she makes.”
    To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.