Frank Figliuzzi: ‘I View the Supreme Court as a National Security Issue’

Wallace Frank Figliuzzi how ░░░░░░░░ you if you had ░░░░░░░░ profile the court I ░░░░░░░░ they offer no specific ░░░░░░░░ of when a president ░░░░░░░░ t do something bold ░░░░░░░░ members of this court ░░░░░░░░ there during the Obama ░░░░░░░░ Bush presidencies which were ░░░░░░░░ both hallmarks of the ░░░░░░░░ security were bold questionable ░░░░░░░░ the case of the ░░░░░░░░ Administration terrorism counterterrorism policies ░░░░░░░░ court offers no example ░░░░░░░░ where anyone in modern ░░░░░░░░ ancient presidential history has ░░░░░░░░ reined in but they ░░░░░░░░ this language about they ░░░░░░░░ to be bold And ░░░░░░░░ also ignore all the ░░░░░░░░ examples We re talking ░░░░░░░░ an ex president who ░░░░░░░░ a deadly insurrection across ░░░░░░░░ street We re talking ░░░░░░░░ an ex president who ░░░░░░░░ classified documents and refused ░░░░░░░░ give them back What ░░░░░░░░ the what is your ░░░░░░░░ guess or your best ░░░░░░░░ of the case on ░░░░░░░░ happened here FIGLIUZZI I ░░░░░░░░ have missed the part ░░░░░░░░ the Constitution where the ░░░░░░░░ must be bold that ░░░░░░░░ interesting I the part ░░░░░░░░ the Constitution that I ░░░░░░░░ is that I took ░░░░░░░░ same oath when I ░░░░░░░░ the FBI that the ░░░░░░░░ of the United States ░░░░░░░░ which is to preserve ░░░░░░░░ and defend the United ░░░░░░░░ and the Constitution So ░░░░░░░░ I m not going ░░░░░░░░ sugarcoat this I view ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court as a ░░░░░░░░ security issue The certain ░░░░░░░░ that we re talking ░░░░░░░░ there is an agenda ░░░░░░░░ They went out of ░░░░░░░░ way I m perfectly ░░░░░░░░ with disagreeing with a ░░░░░░░░ Court decision Heck I ░░░░░░░░ to law school I ░░░░░░░░ argue both sides of ░░░░░░░░ right But that s ░░░░░░░░ what they did here ░░░░░░░░ reason we re dissenting ░░░░░░░░ much for this is ░░░░░░░░ did things they didn ░░░░░░░░ even have to do ░░░░░░░░ know when one of ░░░░░░░░ s lawyers during the ░░░░░░░░ for this decision said ░░░░░░░░ I guess there are ░░░░░░░░ business of alternate electors ░░░░░░░░ fake electors yeah I ░░░░░░░░ you could say that ░░░░░░░░ a personal private non ░░░░░░░░ decision They said no ░░░░░░░░ it is actually it ░░░░░░░░ So they gave him ░░░░░░░░ than he asked for ░░░░░░░░ went out of their ░░░░░░░░ to make this happen ░░░░░░░░ what do I conclude ░░░░░░░░ an investigator There s ░░░░░░░░ agenda among some of ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court justices And ░░░░░░░░ frankly when they speak ░░░░░░░░ at so called private ░░░░░░░░ to groups and organizations ░░░░░░░░ re at dinner after ░░░░░░░░ few drinks we hear ░░░░░░░░ agenda For Samuel Alito ░░░░░░░░ is the belief that ░░░░░░░░ is going to hell ░░░░░░░░ a handbasket and we ░░░░░░░░ to take a more ░░░░░░░░ theocracy approach to running ░░░░░░░░ country We know Amy ░░░░░░░░ Barrett even she had ░░░░░░░░ go off and write ░░░░░░░░ own summary and decision ░░░░░░░░ she came from what ░░░░░░░░ essentially a cult like ░░░░░░░░ where the cult had ░░░░░░░░ approve who she married ░░░░░░░░ is you can t ░░░░░░░░ me this is not ░░░░░░░░ agenda.”