To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Donte Mills: You Cannot Have Every President from Now Until the End of this Nation Be Under the Scrutiny of Any Prosecutor (clip)
Subjects
Source
CNN

Name: CNN
URL: http://www.cnn.com/
Show
CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip

Name: CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip
URL: https://www.cnn.com/
Persons
Robert Ray
, Abby Phillip
, Michael van der Veen
, Donte Mills

Name: Robert Ray
Employment: Al Jazeera
Position: Reporter

Name: Abby Phillip
Employment: CNN
Position: Reporter

Name: Michael van der Veen
Employment: Van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim
Position: Founder
Name: Donte Mills
Event
Event location
–
Link
–
Original recording
Uploaded
07/02/2024 07:11 am
Owner
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (720x406)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:01:27
Views
6
Purchases
0
Transcript
PHILLIP Trump s lawyer ░░░░░░░░ said that the alternate ░░░░░░░░ of electors they believe ░░░░░░░░ Trump trying to organize ░░░░░░░░ to challenge the real ░░░░░░░░ of electors was an ░░░░░░░░ act Do you think ░░░░░░░░ will fly MILLS Maybe ░░░░░░░░ But here s what ░░░░░░░░ know will happen now ░░░░░░░░ on this decision You ░░░░░░░░ t have prosecutors popping ░░░░░░░░ everywhere trying to bring ░░░░░░░░ cases against the president ░░░░░░░░ think that s dangerous ░░░░░░░░ what the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ now said is it ░░░░░░░░ not blanket immunity They ░░░░░░░░ that it s not ░░░░░░░░ immunity You can challenge ░░░░░░░░ presumption of immunity if ░░░░░░░░ show it s outside ░░░░░░░░ scope So that puts ░░░░░░░░ onus on the prosecutors ░░░░░░░░ say If I m ░░░░░░░░ to prosecute a president ░░░░░░░░ the United States for ░░░░░░░░ actions as president I ░░░░░░░░ the burden of showing ░░░░░░░░ crossed the line If ░░░░░░░░ can do that then ░░░░░░░░ could prosecute PHILLIP It ░░░░░░░░ me I m curious ░░░░░░░░ your thoughts on this ░░░░░░░░ the president of the ░░░░░░░░ States has quite a ░░░░░░░░ of powers you all ░░░░░░░░ agree This particular scenario ░░░░░░░░ the president allegedly wanting ░░░░░░░░ use his official power ░░░░░░░░ pervert the actual exercise ░░░░░░░░ democratic institutions If the ░░░░░░░░ uses his official power ░░░░░░░░ do those things what ░░░░░░░░ the recourse in the ░░░░░░░░ of this court VAN ░░░░░░░░ VEEN Well I ve ░░░░░░░░ to tell you first ░░░░░░░░ all that premise is ░░░░░░░░ because and Justice Roberts ░░░░░░░░ addressed it in the ░░░░░░░░ What President Trump did ░░░░░░░░ January 6 was give ░░░░░░░░ speech at the Ellipse ░░░░░░░░ s been taken snippets ░░░░░░░░ out of context PHILLIP ░░░░░░░░ wasn t talking about ░░░░░░░░ speech on the Ellipse ░░░░░░░░ m talking about I ░░░░░░░░ talking about the goal ░░░░░░░░ ultimately was he was ░░░░░░░░ advised to listen this ░░░░░░░░ both what happened and ░░░░░░░░ what could happen He ░░░░░░░░ being advised to seize ░░░░░░░░ election machines to just ░░░░░░░░ take them to try ░░░░░░░░ alter the vote count ░░░░░░░░ was pressuring his vice ░░░░░░░░ to do something that ░░░░░░░░ is constitutionally not MILLS ░░░░░░░░ ll jump in and ░░░░░░░░ Mike here That was ░░░░░░░░ That was wrong and ░░░░░░░░ believe it was wrong ░░░░░░░░ my only issue is ░░░░░░░░ was absolutely wrong and ░░░░░░░░ think Trump stepped he ░░░░░░░░ way over the line ░░░░░░░░ you cannot have every ░░░░░░░░ from now until the ░░░░░░░░ of this nation be ░░░░░░░░ the scrutiny of anybody ░░░░░░░░ prosecutor who wants to ░░░░░░░░ one of their decisions ░░░░░░░░ think big picture we ░░░░░░░░ to protect the president ░░░░░░░░ power in his role ░░░░░░░░ unfortunately we have somebody ░░░░░░░░ crosses that line crossed ░░░░░░░░ as president and may ░░░░░░░░ it even more if ░░░░░░░░ s voted in again ░░░░░░░░ we can t isolate ░░░░░░░░ in a Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ The Supreme Court has ░░░░░░░░ look bigger RAY And ░░░░░░░░ answer to your question ░░░░░░░░ that it s a ░░░░░░░░ exercise which by the ░░░░░░░░ the district court and ░░░░░░░░ court of appeals refused ░░░░░░░░ engage in about sorting ░░░░░░░░ the difference between official ░░░░░░░░ and private action in ░░░░░░░░ with a prosecution of ░░░░░░░░ president PHILLIP And now ░░░░░░░░ re gonna have to ░░░░░░░░ it RAY As it ░░░░░░░░ be I mean the ░░░░░░░░ that the district court ░░░░░░░░ the court of appeals ░░░░░░░░ just sort flew past ░░░░░░░░ action which many pundits ░░░░░░░░ on this network concluded ░░░░░░░░ unassailable legal reasoning has ░░░░░░░░ been shown to have ░░░░░░░░ misguided In fact there ░░░░░░░░ t a single vote ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court for ░░░░░░░░ result Even the justices ░░░░░░░░ dissented I think conceded ░░░░░░░░ there is a zone ░░░░░░░░ immunity that a president ░░░░░░░░ You know we shouldn ░░░░░░░░ let the moment go ░░░░░░░░ to recognize that is ░░░░░░░░ this decision is going ░░░░░░░░ think turn out to ░░░░░░░░ one of the most ░░░░░░░░ decisions of the 21st ░░░░░░░░ UNKNOWN Oh it is ░░░░░░░░ is PHILLIP It certainly ░░░░░░░░ be. Everyone, thank you.”
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.