To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
         
Date
Summary
Norm Eisen Appears on ‘Connect the World’ To Discuss SCOTUS Ruling (clip)
Source
CNN International

Name: CNN International

URL: http://edition.cnn.com/tv

Show
Connect the World

Name: Connect the World

Persons
Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen

Name: Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen

Employment: CNN

Position: Legal Analyst

Event
Event location
Link
Uploaded
06/26/2024 11:16 am
Owner
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1280x720) Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:01:41
Views
1
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
RUSH TRANSCRIPT Analyst norm ░░░░░░░░ abnormal you look at ░░░░░░░░ point to point out ░░░░░░░░ Jessica Just did to ░░░░░░░░ court found that they ░░░░░░░░ t have standing here ░░░░░░░░ did not rule on ░░░░░░░░ merits The overall merits ░░░░░░░░ the case itself just ░░░░░░░░ it couldn t be ░░░░░░░░ Do you anticipate this ░░░░░░░░ then perhaps trigger a ░░░░░░░░ reaction Were there could ░░░░░░░░ some effort for cases ░░░░░░░░ be filed that perhaps ░░░░░░░░ have standing that can ░░░░░░░░ make their way through ░░░░░░░░ courts up to the ░░░░░░░░ Court again Of the ░░░░░░░░ Court uses damn big ░░░░░░░░ to signal when it ░░░░░░░░ walk to hear cases ░░░░░░░░ while there s an ░░░░░░░░ of this that legitimately ░░░░░░░░ of the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ the fifth circuit made ░░░░░░░░ mistake in allowing these ░░░░░░░░ plaintiffs into court didn ░░░░░░░░ understand the shouldn t ░░░░░░░░ him in the courtroom ░░░░░░░░ s also an element ░░░░░░░░ and there is wording ░░░░░░░░ the opinion suggesting some ░░░░░░░░ The First Amendment does ░░░░░░░░ reach to block government ░░░░░░░░ legitimate engagement with social ░░░░░░░░ companies over things like ░░░░░░░░ It doesn t block ░░░░░░░░ from having a conversation ░░░░░░░░ that s what the ░░░░░░░░ showed happened here If ░░░░░░░░ look in the record ░░░░░░░░ I suspect if these ░░░░░░░░ eventually make it back ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court that ░░░░░░░░ outcome will be negative ░░░░░░░░ needs to be allowed ░░░░░░░░ have come To your ░░░░░░░░ there about take the ░░░░░░░░ The court had to ░░░░░░░░ to take up this ░░░░░░░░ and one would imagine ░░░░░░░░ and looking at it ░░░░░░░░ you have six of ░░░░░░░░ justices saying they don ░░░░░░░░ have standing here right ░░░░░░░░ bring this case and ░░░░░░░░ they decided to take ░░░░░░░░ up anyway way Is ░░░░░░░░ part of a broader ░░░░░░░░ by the court to ░░░░░░░░ over broad standing principles ░░░░░░░░ have been utilize This ░░░░░░░░ been a particular problem ░░░░░░░░ to very conservative circuits ░░░░░░░░ saw this with the ░░░░░░░░ case as well The ░░░░░░░░ circuit in the eleventh ░░░░░░░░ are doing policy they ░░░░░░░░ doing legislation is what ░░░░░░░░ used to complain about ░░░░░░░░ liberal court the Warren ░░░░░░░░ doing making pot eventually ░░░░░░░░ from the bench and ░░░░░░░░ s what we ve ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court rejects ░░░░░░░░ there are seem to ░░░░░░░░ six votes on the ░░░░░░░░ Court to get back ░░░░░░░░ the fundamental American idea ░░░░░░░░ we re gonna let ░░░░░░░░ function we re going ░░░░░░░░ let the executive Branch ░░░░░░░░ it s job the ░░░░░░░░ like talking to social ░░░░░░░░ companies the legislative Branch ░░░░░░░░ it s job passing ░░░░░░░░ a we re not ░░░░░░░░ interfere with these hot ░░░░░░░░ issues Now abortion has ░░░░░░░░ an exception but even ░░░░░░░░ the court has we ░░░░░░░░ back with the mythic ░░░░░░░░ So yes I think ░░░░░░░░ is an effort by ░░░░░░░░ court to get this ░░░░░░░░ fifth and eleventh circuit ░░░░░░░░ of the business of ░░░░░░░░ with communications legitimate ones ░░░░░░░░ the government and social ░░░░░░░░ providers and I am ░░░░░░░░ a speed reader nor ░░░░░░░░ I a lawyer so ░░░░░░░░ s Smith little bit ░░░░░░░░ than it does both ░░░░░░░░ and Jessica but in ░░░░░░░░ of the descent here ░░░░░░░░ Alito Thomas and gore ░░░░░░░░ if you ve had ░░░░░░░░ chance to look at ░░░░░░░░ descent Is there anything ░░░░░░░░ there that stands out ░░░░░░░░ with it surprises you ░░░░░░░░ active his vision of ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court should ░░░░░░░░ doing I was really ░░░░░░░░ by the it s ░░░░░░░░ the holding of the ░░░░░░░░ a but the majority ░░░░░░░░ that the court feels ░░░░░░░░ platforms have independent incentives ░░░░░░░░ moderate content and exercise ░░░░░░░░ own judgment and rejecting ░░░░░░░░ fifth circuit attributing every ░░░░░░░░ decision to government glossing ░░░░░░░░ complexities In the evidence ░░░░░░░░ three on the far ░░░░░░░░ of the court are ░░░░░░░░ to substitute their judgment ░░░░░░░░ reading there dissents they ░░░░░░░░ willing to substitute their ░░░░░░░░ for that of the ░░░░░░░░ Branch and to some ░░░░░░░░ of the legislature which ░░░░░░░░ supposed to set policy ░░░░░░░░ So I think there ░░░░░░░░ a kind of radicalism ░░░░░░░░ emerges where they re ░░░░░░░░ to insert themselves to ░░░░░░░░ power over every societal ░░░░░░░░ Companies and government know ░░░░░░░░ majority is rejecting that ░░░░░░░░ I think their view ░░░░░░░░ what happened here in ░░░░░░░░ complexity of the evidence ░░░░░░░░ right and we should ░░░░░░░░ very careful about this ░░░░░░░░ right wing of the ░░░░░░░░ Court institute Life as ░░░░░░░░ do as they would ░░░░░░░░ here as signal by ░░░░░░░░ descent.
>>
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.