To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Norm Eisen Appears on ‘Connect the World’ To Discuss SCOTUS Ruling (clip)
Subjects
Source
CNN International

Name: CNN International
URL: http://edition.cnn.com/tv
Show
Connect the World
Name: Connect the World
Persons
Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen

Name: Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen
Employment: CNN
Position: Legal Analyst
Event
–
Event location
–
Link
–
Original recording
Uploaded
06/26/2024 11:16 am
Owner
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1280x720)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:01:41
Views
1
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
RUSH TRANSCRIPT Analyst norm ░░░░░░░░ abnormal you look at ░░░░░░░░ point to point out ░░░░░░░░ Jessica Just did to ░░░░░░░░ court found that they ░░░░░░░░ t have standing here ░░░░░░░░ did not rule on ░░░░░░░░ merits The overall merits ░░░░░░░░ the case itself just ░░░░░░░░ it couldn t be ░░░░░░░░ Do you anticipate this ░░░░░░░░ then perhaps trigger a ░░░░░░░░ reaction Were there could ░░░░░░░░ some effort for cases ░░░░░░░░ be filed that perhaps ░░░░░░░░ have standing that can ░░░░░░░░ make their way through ░░░░░░░░ courts up to the ░░░░░░░░ Court again Of the ░░░░░░░░ Court uses damn big ░░░░░░░░ to signal when it ░░░░░░░░ walk to hear cases ░░░░░░░░ while there s an ░░░░░░░░ of this that legitimately ░░░░░░░░ of the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ the fifth circuit made ░░░░░░░░ mistake in allowing these ░░░░░░░░ plaintiffs into court didn ░░░░░░░░ understand the shouldn t ░░░░░░░░ him in the courtroom ░░░░░░░░ s also an element ░░░░░░░░ and there is wording ░░░░░░░░ the opinion suggesting some ░░░░░░░░ The First Amendment does ░░░░░░░░ reach to block government ░░░░░░░░ legitimate engagement with social ░░░░░░░░ companies over things like ░░░░░░░░ It doesn t block ░░░░░░░░ from having a conversation ░░░░░░░░ that s what the ░░░░░░░░ showed happened here If ░░░░░░░░ look in the record ░░░░░░░░ I suspect if these ░░░░░░░░ eventually make it back ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court that ░░░░░░░░ outcome will be negative ░░░░░░░░ needs to be allowed ░░░░░░░░ have come To your ░░░░░░░░ there about take the ░░░░░░░░ The court had to ░░░░░░░░ to take up this ░░░░░░░░ and one would imagine ░░░░░░░░ and looking at it ░░░░░░░░ you have six of ░░░░░░░░ justices saying they don ░░░░░░░░ have standing here right ░░░░░░░░ bring this case and ░░░░░░░░ they decided to take ░░░░░░░░ up anyway way Is ░░░░░░░░ part of a broader ░░░░░░░░ by the court to ░░░░░░░░ over broad standing principles ░░░░░░░░ have been utilize This ░░░░░░░░ been a particular problem ░░░░░░░░ to very conservative circuits ░░░░░░░░ saw this with the ░░░░░░░░ case as well The ░░░░░░░░ circuit in the eleventh ░░░░░░░░ are doing policy they ░░░░░░░░ doing legislation is what ░░░░░░░░ used to complain about ░░░░░░░░ liberal court the Warren ░░░░░░░░ doing making pot eventually ░░░░░░░░ from the bench and ░░░░░░░░ s what we ve ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court rejects ░░░░░░░░ there are seem to ░░░░░░░░ six votes on the ░░░░░░░░ Court to get back ░░░░░░░░ the fundamental American idea ░░░░░░░░ we re gonna let ░░░░░░░░ function we re going ░░░░░░░░ let the executive Branch ░░░░░░░░ it s job the ░░░░░░░░ like talking to social ░░░░░░░░ companies the legislative Branch ░░░░░░░░ it s job passing ░░░░░░░░ a we re not ░░░░░░░░ interfere with these hot ░░░░░░░░ issues Now abortion has ░░░░░░░░ an exception but even ░░░░░░░░ the court has we ░░░░░░░░ back with the mythic ░░░░░░░░ So yes I think ░░░░░░░░ is an effort by ░░░░░░░░ court to get this ░░░░░░░░ fifth and eleventh circuit ░░░░░░░░ of the business of ░░░░░░░░ with communications legitimate ones ░░░░░░░░ the government and social ░░░░░░░░ providers and I am ░░░░░░░░ a speed reader nor ░░░░░░░░ I a lawyer so ░░░░░░░░ s Smith little bit ░░░░░░░░ than it does both ░░░░░░░░ and Jessica but in ░░░░░░░░ of the descent here ░░░░░░░░ Alito Thomas and gore ░░░░░░░░ if you ve had ░░░░░░░░ chance to look at ░░░░░░░░ descent Is there anything ░░░░░░░░ there that stands out ░░░░░░░░ with it surprises you ░░░░░░░░ active his vision of ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court should ░░░░░░░░ doing I was really ░░░░░░░░ by the it s ░░░░░░░░ the holding of the ░░░░░░░░ a but the majority ░░░░░░░░ that the court feels ░░░░░░░░ platforms have independent incentives ░░░░░░░░ moderate content and exercise ░░░░░░░░ own judgment and rejecting ░░░░░░░░ fifth circuit attributing every ░░░░░░░░ decision to government glossing ░░░░░░░░ complexities In the evidence ░░░░░░░░ three on the far ░░░░░░░░ of the court are ░░░░░░░░ to substitute their judgment ░░░░░░░░ reading there dissents they ░░░░░░░░ willing to substitute their ░░░░░░░░ for that of the ░░░░░░░░ Branch and to some ░░░░░░░░ of the legislature which ░░░░░░░░ supposed to set policy ░░░░░░░░ So I think there ░░░░░░░░ a kind of radicalism ░░░░░░░░ emerges where they re ░░░░░░░░ to insert themselves to ░░░░░░░░ power over every societal ░░░░░░░░ Companies and government know ░░░░░░░░ majority is rejecting that ░░░░░░░░ I think their view ░░░░░░░░ what happened here in ░░░░░░░░ complexity of the evidence ░░░░░░░░ right and we should ░░░░░░░░ very careful about this ░░░░░░░░ right wing of the ░░░░░░░░ Court institute Life as ░░░░░░░░ do as they would ░░░░░░░░ here as signal by ░░░░░░░░ descent.
>>
>>
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.




