To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Norm Eisen Appears on CNN’s ‘The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer’ to Discuss Trump Immunity (clip)
Subjects
Source
CNN

Name: CNN
URL: http://www.cnn.com/
Show
The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer (CNN)

Name: The Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer (CNN)
URL: https://www.cnn.com/shows/situation-room
Persons
Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen

Name: Norman Eisen / Norm Eisen
Employment: CNN
Position: Legal Analyst
Event
Event location
–
Link
–
Original recording
Uploaded
06/24/2024 09:32 am
Owner
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1280x720)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:00:45
Views
1
Purchases
0
Transcript
RUSH TRANSCRIPT Fort pierce ░░░░░░░░ reporting and all of ░░░░░░░░ Thank you very much ░░░░░░░░ legal and political experts ░░░░░░░░ here to break all ░░░░░░░░ this down for us ░░░░░░░░ down norm eisen Let ░░░░░░░░ start with you but ░░░░░░░░ I want to inform ░░░░░░░░ viewers You re on ░░░░░░░░ board of a non ░░░░░░░░ that actually filed a ░░░░░░░░ You didn t sign ░░░░░░░░ or contribute to it ░░░░░░░░ you know a lot ░░░░░░░░ it Specifically involving Trump ░░░░░░░░ defense team arguing the ░░░░░░░░ Smith should no longer ░░░░░░░░ the special counsel wealth ░░░░░░░░ arguments to knock out ░░░░░░░░ counsels have been tried ░░░░░░░░ court after court before ░░░░░░░░ democratic appointed judges and ░░░░░░░░ appointed judges they have ░░░░░░░░ failed Cannon s skeptical ░░░░░░░░ of both sides what ░░░░░░░░ know from the hearing ░░░░░░░░ there is no legal ░░░░░░░░ to challenge the appointment ░░░░░░░░ special counsel Jack Smith ░░░░░░░░ there s no constitutional ░░░░░░░░ know regulatory infirmity This ░░░░░░░░ an example of judge ░░░░░░░░ s typical over caution ░░░░░░░░ she confronts these issues ░░░░░░░░ should not have wasted ░░░░░░░░ day on it Adams ░░░░░░░░ this conversation At least ░░░░░░░░ former federal prosecutor you ░░░░░░░░ what s going on ░░░░░░░░ lot better than those ░░░░░░░░ us who didn t ░░░░░░░░ to law school Do ░░░░░░░░ kenneth didn t issue ░░░░░░░░ ruling today How likely ░░░░░░░░ this challenge to succeed ░░░░░░░░ s highly unlikely for ░░░░░░░░ to succeed at least ░░░░░░░░ all hope it is ░░░░░░░░ as norm also indicated ░░░░░░░░ is kind of well ░░░░░░░░ There is precedent and ░░░░░░░░ arguments since have been ░░░░░░░░ before other judges in ░░░░░░░░ D C circuit for ░░░░░░░░ more recently with the ░░░░░░░░ of Bob Mueller and ░░░░░░░░ have been rejected I ░░░░░░░░ judge cannon was being ░░░░░░░░ cautious She allowed the ░░░░░░░░ to make a record ░░░░░░░░ that s also why ░░░░░░░░ oddly allowed these friends ░░░░░░░░ the court to make ░░░░░░░░ arguments which I have ░░░░░░░░ say it was an ░░░░░░░░ step I have never ░░░░░░░░ it in my years ░░░░░░░░ practice and so I ░░░░░░░░ she s going to ░░░░░░░░ all of that back ░░░░░░░░ who are really really ░░░░░░░░ And again we don ░░░░░░░░ know what she s ░░░░░░░░ do but I think ░░░░░░░░ s unlikely that she ░░░░░░░░ move to remove Jack ░░░░░░░░ will find out fairly ░░░░░░░░ I suspect Phil Mattingly ░░░░░░░░ of judge cannon as ░░░░░░░░ well know have noted ░░░░░░░░ that other judges have ░░░░░░░░ rejected these sorts of ░░░░░░░░ about removing special counsels ░░░░░░░░ s been that s ░░░░░░░░ history right Not just ░░░░░░░░ I think you just ░░░░░░░░ to look at the ░░░░░░░░ and you can objectives ░░░░░░░░ say that whether it ░░░░░░░░ in the Hunter Biden ░░░░░░░░ counsel case Robert molar ░░░░░░░░ you were just citing ░░░░░░░░ to Nixon becton Dickson ░░░░░░░░ is back in the ░░░░░░░░ 70s that this is ░░░░░░░░ settled at this point ░░░░░░░░ at least the precedent ░░░░░░░░ pretty said Would dispute ░░░░░░░░ some degree is that ░░░░░░░░ they might not win ░░░░░░░░ particular motion but they ░░░░░░░░ winning if you re ░░░░░░░░ s lawyers right now ░░░░░░░░ you re drawing it ░░░░░░░░ it based on what ░░░░░░░░ Cannon has done it ░░░░░░░░ made the point over ░░░░░░░░ methodical and some level ░░░░░░░░ hearings on everything even ░░░░░░░░ it diverges from how ░░░░░░░░ court usually operates down ░░░░░░░░ it just gives the ░░░░░░░░ team what they want ░░░░░░░░ as you continue to ░░░░░░░░ it further down the ░░░░░░░░ evans said it eats ░░░░░░░░ the calendar Before November ░░░░░░░░ s the goal And ░░░░░░░░ that sense they re ░░░░░░░░ in some level Reid ░░░░░░░░ re watching all of ░░░░░░░░ very closely especially the ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court We re ░░░░░░░░ awaiting this ruling from ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court on whether ░░░░░░░░ should have immunity from ░░░░░░░░ criminal prosecution The earliest ░░░░░░░░ can now get a ░░░░░░░░ from the nine justices ░░░░░░░░ next Wednesday In this ░░░░░░░░ to the other Jack ░░░░░░░░ case against the former ░░░░░░░░ related it s election ░░░░░░░░ and January 6 Implications ░░░░░░░░ just for the former ░░░░░░░░ but for future presidents ░░░░░░░░ well as one of ░░░░░░░░ biggest questions on presidential ░░░░░░░░ that the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ contemplated in recent years ░░░░░░░░ the lower courts this ░░░░░░░░ that for the former ░░░░░░░░ has some immunity or ░░░░░░░░ immunity has been completely ░░░░░░░░ Even though sources and ░░░░░░░░ world didn t expect ░░░░░░░░ this would be accepted ░░░░░░░░ the high court during ░░░░░░░░ arguments the justices it ░░░░░░░░ open to at least ░░░░░░░░ even some limited immunity ░░░░░░░░ presidents which would mean ░░░░░░░░ whole case goes back ░░░░░░░░ to the lower courts ░░░░░░░░ a lot of folks ░░░░░░░░ asking well why is ░░░░░░░░ taking them so long ░░░░░░░░ ve been in no ░░░░░░░░ to move on This ░░░░░░░░ Smith asked him to ░░░░░░░░ this question back in ░░░░░░░░ instead they waited for ░░░░░░░░ to go through the ░░░░░░░░ process arrive at them ░░░░░░░░ now we re in ░░░░░░░░ last week What we ░░░░░░░░ will maybe b the ░░░░░░░░ week and we re ░░░░░░░░ waiting on this decision ░░░░░░░░ they re helping in ░░░░░░░░ Trump s strategy to ░░░░░░░░ lash taking a long ░░░░░░░░ but it s very ░░░░░░░░ decision that we re ░░░░░░░░ waiting for What do ░░░░░░░░ think at least what ░░░░░░░░ the most likely outcome ░░░░░░░░ to the oral argument ░░░░░░░░ most likely outcome is ░░░░░░░░ is going back to ░░░░░░░░ district court for some ░░░░░░░░ findings I think the ░░░░░░░░ is most likely going ░░░░░░░░ require the judge to ░░░░░░░░ what was official acts ░░░░░░░░ what we re unofficial ░░░░░░░░ seem like That s ░░░░░░░░ they were heading Going ░░░░░░░░ have to wait until ░░░░░░░░ see but no matter ░░░░░░░░ I think the important ░░░░░░░░ is that just like ░░░░░░░░ classified documents case it ░░░░░░░░ going to kick this ░░░░░░░░ farther down the road ░░░░░░░░ I don t see ░░░░░░░░ case going to trial ░░░░░░░░ for the election in ░░░░░░░░ So get to that ░░░░░░░░ if the strategy was ░░░░░░░░ the leg they have ░░░░░░░░ Do you see it ░░░░░░░░ course leases right There ░░░░░░░░ a test to get ░░░░░░░░ trial That case to ░░░░░░░░ But what you might ░░░░░░░░ is a mini trial ░░░░░░░░ if there s a ░░░░░░░░ for judge Chutkan in ░░░░░░░░ C She s got ░░░░░░░░ apply the evidence to ░░░░░░░░ law And that means ░░░░░░░░ needs to take witnesses ░░░░░░░░ saw this in the ░░░░░░░░ of the Georgia 2020 ░░░░░░░░ interference case There were ░░░░░░░░ Mark Meadows Jeffrey Clark ░░░░░░░░ mini trial does Donald ░░░░░░░░ have this immunity Or ░░░░░░░░ So that could have ░░░░░░░░ impact not the same ░░░░░░░░ the trial but we ░░░░░░░░ have that same attention ░░░░░░░░ the courts have been ░░░░░░░░ important in this 2024 ░░░░░░░░ season we bring fell ░░░░░░░░ this conversation fill as ░░░░░░░░ know a clerk to ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court justice Anthony ░░░░░░░░ I m talking about ░░░░░░░░ Lipman writes this in ░░░░░░░░ new op ed and ░░░░░░░░ me put it up ░░░░░░░░ the screen and read ░░░░░░░░ reasons to think something ░░░░░░░░ rotten at the court ░░░░░░░░ impossible to ignore Benefit ░░░░░░░░ the doubt for myriad ░░░░░░░░ including its willingness to ░░░░░░░░ quickly in cases that ░░░░░░░░ Republican interests and quote ░░░░░░░░ is this delay likely ░░░░░░░░ impact the court I ░░░░░░░░ that likely to impact ░░░░░░░░ respect of the court ░░░░░░░░ all of that Much ░░░░░░░░ in the wake of ░░░░░░░░ Dobbs decision that struck ░░░░░░░░ Roe versus Wade tract ░░░░░░░░ where the entire country ░░░░░░░░ seen its politics over ░░░░░░░░ course of the last ░░░░░░░░ years Where does now ░░░░░░░░ very split issue its ░░░░░░░░ level has been kind ░░░░░░░░ hovering around 40 35 ░░░░░░░░ its lowest point It ░░░░░░░░ t seem like it ░░░░░░░░ going going up anytime ░░░░░░░░ People on partisan basis ░░░░░░░░ very clear views The ░░░░░░░░ piece that you re ░░░░░░░░ there is both comprehensive ░░░░░░░░ it s compelling in ░░░░░░░░ sense that it pulls ░░░░░░░░ a lot of examples ░░░░░░░░ she says prove their ░░░░░░░░ I have no reporting ░░░░░░░░ how the court is ░░░░░░░░ the timing of this ░░░░░░░░ case What I do ░░░░░░░░ though is particularly heading ░░░░░░░░ the November election what ░░░░░░░░ demonstrates more than anything ░░░░░░░░ is a 6 3 ░░░░░░░░ majority has actual repercussions ░░░░░░░░ have moved the court ░░░░░░░░ a very clear ideological ░░░░░░░░ on some of most ░░░░░░░░ And I think divisive ░░░░░░░░ inside the country that ░░░░░░░░ the way it works ░░░░░░░░ some level And I ░░░░░░░░ why people might not ░░░░░░░░ it or be viscerally ░░░░░░░░ to it but they ░░░░░░░░ acidic confirm judges And ░░░░░░░░ you re the Biden ░░░░░░░░ I think you re ░░░░░░░░ at this and you ░░░░░░░░ looking at the age ░░░░░░░░ the current the court ░░░░░░░░ you re making this ░░░░░░░░ central issue like Donald ░░░░░░░░ very effectively did 2016 ░░░░░░░░ key ruling we re ░░░░░░░░ waiting for as you ░░░░░░░░ this Paula on involving ░░░░░░░░ January 6 defendants it ░░░░░░░░ also impact the criminal ░░░░░░░░ potentially against Donald Trump ░░░░░░░░ January 6 what are ░░░░░░░░ stakes in this specific ░░░░░░░░ Big outstanding cases before ░░░░░░░░ high court in here ░░░░░░░░ s a question of ░░░░░░░░ you can charge someone ░░░░░░░░ obstruction Does it apply ░░░░░░░░ the insurrection What we ░░░░░░░░ on January 6 or ░░░░░░░░ obstruction of an official ░░░░░░░░ is that limited mostly ░░░░░░░░ investing Now here you ░░░░░░░░ focused on a defendant ░░░░░░░░ was charged with seven ░░░░░░░░ counts One of them ░░░░░░░░ obstruction depending on how ░░░░░░░░ case goes this could ░░░░░░░░ impact the case against ░░░░░░░░ former president president when ░░░░░░░░ talked to his lawyers ░░░░░░░░ refer to this case ░░░░░░░░ the immunity case as ░░░░░░░░ our cases But to ░░░░░░░░ s point I think ░░░░░░░░ these cases rep potentially ░░░░░░░░ an impact on the ░░░░░░░░ president when it comes ░░░░░░░░ the election the outstanding ░░░░░░░░ case out of Idaho ░░░░░░░░ on what the justices ░░░░░░░░ there that decision could ░░░░░░░░ the biggest impact on ░░░░░░░░ election in terms of ░░░░░░░░ voters will be watching ░░░░░░░░ of these decisions And ░░░░░░░░ ll be coming in ░░░░░░░░ next two weeks or
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.