Lisa Rubin Compares ‘Credibility’ of Hope Hicks and Stormy Daniels: One Worked for Trump Twice, ‘Who Lacks Credibility Now?’

WEISSMANN You know she ░░░░░░░░ treated so differently than ░░░░░░░░ witnesses Hope Hicks and ░░░░░░░░ Pecker the person who ░░░░░░░░ The National Enquirer were ░░░░░░░░ witnesses Their substantive testimony ░░░░░░░░ so damning for Donald ░░░░░░░░ and their cross examination ░░░░░░░░ with kid gloves RUBIN ░░░░░░░░ s testimony is in ░░░░░░░░ respects more devastating to ░░░░░░░░ former president than Hope ░░░░░░░░ Because of her proximity ░░░░░░░░ questioned her credibility But ░░░░░░░░ you take a step ░░░░░░░░ and you separate these ░░░░░░░░ and you forget about ░░░░░░░░ accident of their respective ░░░░░░░░ Hope Hicks for example ░░░░░░░░ from very wealthy Greenwich ░░░░░░░░ being raised as a ░░░░░░░░ Lauren model sort of ░░░░░░░░ epitome of poise and ░░░░░░░░ in the Trump White ░░░░░░░░ contrasted with Stormy Daniels ░░░░░░░░ had by contrast a ░░░░░░░░ rough childhood a mother ░░░░░░░░ abandoned her all of ░░░░░░░░ comes out on her ░░░░░░░░ examination But the difference ░░░░░░░░ how they were trusted ░░░░░░░░ think is really palpable ░░░░░░░░ sort of a toxic ░░░░░░░░ of class and misogyny ░░░░░░░░ was absolutely a judgment ░░░░░░░░ her credibility based on ░░░░░░░░ she did for a ░░░░░░░░ And then you have ░░░░░░░░ think to yourself Wait ░░░░░░░░ second Hope Hicks may ░░░░░░░░ the way that she ░░░░░░░░ but she not only ░░░░░░░░ for Trump once she ░░░░░░░░ for Trump twice She ░░░░░░░░ the White House in ░░░░░░░░ of 2018 came back ░░░░░░░░ work for the former ░░░░░░░░ and stayed after he ░░░░░░░░ the election despite the ░░░░░░░░ that she was privately ░░░░░░░░ him that he had ░░░░░░░░ and the things that ░░░░░░░░ lawyers or allies were ░░░░░░░░ about his not losing ░░░░░░░░ election and his winning ░░░░░░░░ fraudulent She still stayed ░░░░░░░░ so I gotta ask ░░░░░░░░ question like who lacks ░░░░░░░░ now?”