Justice KBJ: ‘There May Be Circumstances in Which the Government Could Prohibit Certain Speech on the Internet or Otherwise’

Jackson whether or not ░░░░░░░░ government can do this ░░░░░░░░ is something I took ░░░░░░░░ with Mr Fletcher depends ░░░░░░░░ the application of our ░░░░░░░░ Amendment jurisprudence and there ░░░░░░░░ be circumstances in which ░░░░░░░░ government could prohibit certain ░░░░░░░░ on the Internet or ░░░░░░░░ I mean do you ░░░░░░░░ you do you disagree ░░░░░░░░ we would have to ░░░░░░░░ strict scrutiny and determine ░░░░░░░░ or not there is ░░░░░░░░ compelling interest and how ░░░░░░░░ government has tailored it ░░░░░░░░ regulation AGUINAGA Certainly Your ░░░░░░░░ I think at the ░░░░░░░░ of every First Amendment ░░░░░░░░ you ll have the ░░░░░░░░ scrutiny framework in which ░░░░░░░░ know in some national ░░░░░░░░ indecipherable for example the ░░░░░░░░ may well be able ░░░░░░░░ demonstrate crosstalk Jackson All ░░░░░░░░ So so so not ░░░░░░░░ situation in which the ░░░░░░░░ engages in conduct that ░░░░░░░░ has some effect on ░░░░░░░░ on speech necessarily becomes ░░░░░░░░ First Amendment violation correct ░░░░░░░░ Maybe not necessarily Your ░░░░░░░░ I guess the top ░░░░░░░░ question I would ask ░░░░░░░░ has the government set ░░░░░░░░ to abridge the freedom ░░░░░░░░ speech And in this ░░░░░░░░ you see that time ░░░░░░░░ time again because if ░░░░░░░░ control Jackson That s ░░░░░░░░ the test for First ░░░░░░░░ violations AGUINAGA Your Honor ░░░░░░░░ flows from the plain ░░░░░░░░ of the First Amendment ░░░░░░░░ Jackson No I understand ░░░░░░░░ we have we have ░░░░░░░░ test for a determination ░░░░░░░░ whether or not the ░░░░░░░░ Amendment is actually violated ░░░░░░░░ in certain situations you ░░░░░░░░ the government can actually ░░░░░░░░ that speech be suppressed ░░░░░░░░ there s a compelling ░░░░░░░░ right AGUINAGA It can ░░░░░░░░ Honor And I guess ░░░░░░░░ I would say is ░░░░░░░░ the courts below never ░░░░░░░░ to strict scrutiny because ░░░░░░░░ government never raised this ░░░░░░░░ has never been litigated ░░░░░░░░ question in this case ░░░░░░░░ whether at the front ░░░░░░░░ the government itself has ░░░░░░░░ action Jackson It s ░░░░░░░░ coercion it s the ░░░░░░░░ action right That s ░░░░░░░░ question in this case ░░░░░░░░ And I would urge ░░░░░░░░ court to address the ░░░░░░░░ action issue just like ░░░░░░░░ ve addressed it in ░░░░░░░░ Books you used that ░░░░░░░░ four times in Bantam ░░░░░░░░