Ken Buck Says Comer and Jordan ‘Were Warned’ Ex-Informant’s Claim Was Uncorroborated – But Touted It Anyway

COLLINS You know looking ░░░░░░░░ what you said last ░░░░░░░░ you were condemning your ░░░░░░░░ party s impeachment efforts ░░░░░░░░ that Republicans in the ░░░░░░░░ who are itching for ░░░░░░░░ impeachment inquiry are relying ░░░░░░░░ an imagined history Did ░░░░░░░░ ever think that it ░░░░░░░░ collapse in this spectacular ░░░░░░░░ a fashion BUCK Well ░░░░░░░░ it s even more ░░░░░░░░ an imagined history now ░░░░░░░░ this witness and we ░░░░░░░░ warned at the time ░░░░░░░░ we received the document ░░░░░░░░ this witness s testimony ░░░░░░░░ were from warned that ░░░░░░░░ credibility of this statement ░░░░░░░░ not known And yet ░░░░░░░░ my colleagues went out ░░░░░░░░ talked to the public ░░░░░░░░ how this was credible ░░░░░░░░ how it was damning ░░░░░░░░ how it proved President ░░░░░░░░ s at the time ░░░░░░░░ President Biden s complicity ░░░░░░░░ receiving bribes It appears ░░░░░░░░ absolutely be false and ░░░░░░░░ really undercut the nature ░░░░░░░░ the charges We ve ░░░░░░░░ been looking for a ░░░░░░░░ between what Hunter Biden ░░░░░░░░ in terms of money ░░░░░░░░ Joe Biden s activities ░░░░░░░░ Joe Biden receiving money ░░░░░░░░ clearly is not a ░░░░░░░░ Link at this point ░░░░░░░░ So James Comer and ░░░░░░░░ Jordan they knew that ░░░░░░░░ was not corroborated information ░░░░░░░░ they still went public ░░░░░░░░ it talked about it ░░░░░░░░ television used it to ░░░░░░░░ these investigations regardless BUCK ░░░░░░░░ s what it appears ░░░░░░░░ certainly didn t have ░░░░░░░░ evidence outside the statement ░░░░░░░░ that it was credible ░░░░░░░░ as a prosecutor for ░░░░░░░░ years Kaitlan I never ░░░░░░░░ to the public until ░░░░░░░░ could prove the reliability ░░░░░░░░ a statement and even ░░░░░░░░ the only public statement ░░░░░░░░ prosecutor makes is the ░░░░░░░░ document Let s see ░░░░░░░░ the evidence is in ░░░░░░░░ impeachment if there is ░░░░░░░░ evidence before going forward ░░░░░░░░ You ve been very ░░░░░░░░ of this effort that ░░░░░░░░ so clearly in the ░░░░░░░░ this impeachment inquiry You ░░░░░░░░ voted for the impeachment ░░░░░░░░ though Do you now ░░░░░░░░ s happened this week ░░░░░░░░ that you had not ░░░░░░░░ for that BUCK No ░░░░░░░░ difference between voting for ░░░░░░░░ impeachment and an impeachment ░░░░░░░░ The inquiry was really ░░░░░░░░ because the White House ░░░░░░░░ to provide documents that ░░░░░░░░ requested subpoenaed because they ░░░░░░░░ that there was no ░░░░░░░░ impeachment inquiry voted on ░░░░░░░░ the House At that ░░░░░░░░ I thought there is ░░░░░░░░ downside to voting for ░░░░░░░░ impeachment inquiry as long ░░░░░░░░ the public knows as ░░░░░░░░ as my constituents know ░░░░░░░░ don t believe that ░░░░░░░░ evidence is there that ░░░░░░░░ an impeachment at this ░░░░░░░░ But certainly an inquiry ░░░░░░░░ the gathering of information ░░░░░░░░ s gather information but ░░░░░░░░ s not draw conclusions ░░░░░░░░ we have all the ░░░░░░░░