To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Toobin on Fani Willis-Wade Probe: ‘So What if They Had This Relationship?’ (clip) (clip)
Subjects
Show
Anderson Cooper 360
, Anderson Cooper 360
Name: Anderson Cooper 360
URL: https://www.cnn.com/shows/ac-360
Name: Anderson Cooper 360
URL: https://www.cnn.com/shows/ac-360
Persons
Jeffrey Toobin
, Jeffrey Toobin, Anderson Cooper
, Anderson Cooper, Caroline Polisi
, Caroline Polisi, Jessica Roth
, Jessica Roth
Name: Jeffrey Toobin
Employment: CNN
Position: Senior Legal Analyst
Name: Jeffrey Toobin
Employment: CNN
Position: Senior Legal Analyst
Name: Anderson Cooper
Employment: CNN
Position: Host
Name: Anderson Cooper
Employment: CNN
Position: Host
Name: Caroline Polisi
Employment: Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Position: Attorney
Name: Caroline Polisi
Employment: Armstrong Teasdale LLP
Position: Attorney
Name: Jessica Roth
Employment: Cardozo School of Law
Position: Professor
Name: Jessica Roth
Employment: Cardozo School of Law
Position: Professor
Event location
–
Link
–
Uploaded
02/16/2024 02:54 pm
Owner
Type
Audio
Format
MP3
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:00:27
Views
0
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
RUSH TRANSCRIPT And this ░░░░░░░░ a classic case of ░░░░░░░░ cover up is worse ░░░░░░░░ only person making that ░░░░░░░░ is this one we ░░░░░░░░ just going to ask ░░░░░░░░ question So what so ░░░░░░░░ if they had this ░░░░░░░░ So the question is ░░░░░░░░ they lie But I ░░░░░░░░ with what if they ░░░░░░░░ it exactly Why why ░░░░░░░░ it does this prejudice ░░░░░░░░ Trump or any of ░░░░░░░░ defendants at all I ░░░░░░░░ that s the thing ░░░░░░░░ s so baffling about ░░░░░░░░ this Suppose they have ░░░░░░░░ relationship suppose they lied ░░░░░░░░ does that disqualify them ░░░░░░░░ this in this proceeding ░░░░░░░░ maybe an attorney line ░░░░░░░░ the it s a ░░░░░░░░ for that she should ░░░░░░░░ voted out of office ░░░░░░░░ s a legitimate But ░░░░░░░░ there is no prejudice ░░░░░░░░ Donald But just the ░░░░░░░░ Jessica did did the ░░░░░░░░ they didn t really ░░░░░░░░ question Fani Willis about ░░░░░░░░ the relationship began or ░░░░░░░░ mean they didn t ░░░░░░░░ any actual timeline here ░░░░░░░░ really any pursue any ░░░░░░░░ of lines of questioning ░░░░░░░░ did say where the ░░░░░░░░ began and it was ░░░░░░░░ with what Nathan Wade ░░░░░░░░ said which was it ░░░░░░░░ in 2022 So after ░░░░░░░░ had been appointed and ░░░░░░░░ continued through 2023 they ░░░░░░░░ said it ended roughly ░░░░░░░░ same period of time ░░░░░░░░ would suggest if you ░░░░░░░░ both of them that ░░░░░░░░ she appointed him to ░░░░░░░░ role of special prosecutor ░░░░░░░░ were not involved in ░░░░░░░░ romantic relationship The only ░░░░░░░░ that was proffered to ░░░░░░░░ contrary it was the ░░░░░░░░ of that one witness ░░░░░░░░ is her former friend ░░░░░░░░ said in a very ░░░░░░░░ of non spam Pacific ░░░░░░░░ that she believed that ░░░░░░░░ had been having a ░░░░░░░░ relationship way back before ░░░░░░░░ 20 2020 to date ░░░░░░░░ did not find that ░░░░░░░░ credible She was not ░░░░░░░░ she clearly seemed to ░░░░░░░░ an ax to grind ░░░░░░░░ Fani Willis So when ░░░░░░░░ put the sworn testimony ░░░░░░░░ these two attorneys against ░░░░░░░░ testimony of that one ░░░░░░░░ I
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.
