To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
         
Date
Summary
FBI’s Wray Says Agents Weren’t Disciplined for Targeting Catholics Because It Wasn’t ‘Intentional’ (clip) (clip)
Source
U.S. Senate

Name: U.S. Senate

URL: http://senate.gov

Show
Persons
Christopher Wray

Name: Christopher Wray

Employment: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Position: Director

, Josh Hawley

Name: Josh Hawley

Employment: Missouri

Position: Senator

Event
Event location
Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.

Name: Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.

URL: http://www.visitthecapitol.gov/

Link
Uploaded
01/25/2024 09:11 am
Owner
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (720x406) Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:07:07
Views
0
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
HAWLEY Thank you Mr ░░░░░░░░ Director Wray thank you ░░░░░░░░ being here I noticed ░░░░░░░░ interest in your written ░░░░░░░░ that you said and ░░░░░░░░ m quoting you now ░░░░░░░░ FBI uses all tools ░░░░░░░░ at its disposal to ░░░░░░░░ domestic terrorism which now ░░░░░░░░ includes the crime of ░░░░░░░░ Catholic Let s talk ░░░░░░░░ little bit about the ░░░░░░░░ s egregious targeting of ░░░░░░░░ Americans You have repeatedly ░░░░░░░░ asked about the memo ░░░░░░░░ by the Richmond Field ░░░░░░░░ we now know in ░░░░░░░░ with multiple other field ░░░░░░░░ about recruiting sources in ░░░░░░░░ churches you have repeatedly ░░░░░░░░ that no human sources ░░░░░░░░ approached This is you ░░░░░░░░ July the 12th in ░░░░░░░░ House You were asked ░░░░░░░░ by Jim Jordan do ░░░░░░░░ think that priests ought ░░░░░░░░ be approached to give ░░░░░░░░ on parishioners You said ░░░░░░░░ sir No sir You ░░░░░░░░ on to say we ░░░░░░░░ not recruit open or ░░░░░░░░ human sources We do ░░░░░░░░ report on religious organizations ░░░░░░░░ went on to say ░░░░░░░░ product meaning the Richmond ░░░░░░░░ has not resulted in ░░░░░░░░ investigative action But now ░░░░░░░░ know that in fact ░░░░░░░░ agents did approach a ░░░░░░░░ and a choir director ░░░░░░░░ ask them to inform ░░░░░░░░ parishioners So were you ░░░░░░░░ too when you gave ░░░░░░░░ testimony or were you ░░░░░░░░ to Congress Wray Neither ░░░░░░░░ the your your question ░░░░░░░░ two different things There ░░░░░░░░ the intelligence product itself ░░░░░░░░ the Richmond Field Office ░░░░░░░░ it was written by ░░░░░░░░ our inspection found by ░░░░░░░░ in Richmond reviewed by ░░░░░░░░ in Richmond and captioned ░░░░░░░░ Field Office product Separately ░░░░░░░░ that there was an ░░░░░░░░ of a specific individual ░░░░░░░░ was amassing Molotov cocktails ░░░░░░░░ posting about killing people ░░░░░░░░ it does not surprise ░░░░░░░░ that there were people ░░░░░░░░ knew that subject in ░░░░░░░░ investigation that is the ░░░░░░░░ building the Molotov cocktails ░░░░░░░░ trying to kill people ░░░░░░░░ people talked to the ░░░░░░░░ who knew that person ░░░░░░░░ I think the product ░░░░░░░░ Richmond intelligence product which ░░░░░░░░ that investigation is actually ░░░░░░░░ transparent about exactly what ░░░░░░░░ just said HAWLEY No ░░░░░░░░ don t think so ░░░░░░░░ all In fact the ░░░░░░░░ reason we know this ░░░░░░░░ a whistleblower has come ░░░░░░░░ and told the House ░░░░░░░░ oath that the FBI ░░░░░░░░ and interviewed priests and ░░░░░░░░ directors in the Richmond ░░░░░░░░ The House goes on ░░░░░░░░ say that the FBI ░░░░░░░░ repeatedly refused to disclose ░░░░░░░░ information The only reason ░░░░░░░░ know it is because ░░░░░░░░ whistleblower came forward with ░░░░░░░░ Just like the only ░░░░░░░░ we know about this ░░░░░░░░ is because a whistleblower ░░░░░░░░ forward with it How ░░░░░░░░ other parishes around the ░░░░░░░░ had priests or choir ░░░░░░░░ have been approached By ░░░░░░░░ way are Catholic choirs ░░░░░░░░ are they are they ░░░░░░░░ grounds for domestic terrorism ░░░░░░░░ this is this your ░░░░░░░░ theory How many other ░░░░░░░░ have FBI agents approached ░░░░░░░░ and choir directors to ░░░░░░░░ about parishioners Wray Look ░░░░░░░░ we do not and ░░░░░░░░ not conduct investigations based ░░░░░░░░ anybody s exercise of ░░░░░░░░ constitutionaly protected religious HAWLEY ░░░░░░░░ have done so And ░░░░░░░░ memo explicitly asks for ░░░░░░░░ Your memo labels traditional ░░░░░░░░ as racially and ethnically ░░░░░░░░ violent extremists in need ░░░░░░░░ investigation You have a ░░░░░░░░ of churches a list ░░░░░░░░ the memo you ve ░░░░░░░░ said we don t ░░░░░░░░ churches we don t ░░░░░░░░ churches They re listed ░░░░░░░░ the memo So how ░░░░░░░░ other parishes have you ░░░░░░░░ to to talk to ░░░░░░░░ directors for heaven s ░░░░░░░░ Wray As I ve ░░░░░░░░ HAWLEY Do you know ░░░░░░░░ answer to that question ░░░░░░░░ No I don t ░░░░░░░░ the answer to that ░░░░░░░░ But I can tell ░░░░░░░░ that we don t ░░░░░░░░ people for their exercise ░░░░░░░░ their constantly protected constitutionally ░░░░░░░░ religious expressions The particular ░░░░░░░░ product is something that ░░░░░░░░ soon as I saw ░░░░░░░░ I was aghast I ░░░░░░░░ it withdrawn HAWLEY You ░░░░░░░░ aghast Wray I was ░░░░░░░░ Oh really Wray Yes ░░░░░░░░ HAWLEY And what have ░░░░░░░░ done about it Did ░░░░░░░░ fire the people who ░░░░░░░░ it Wray No I ░░░░░░░░ it withdrawn HAWLEY Have ░░░░░░░░ fired anybody involved in ░░░░░░░░ Senator if you would ░░░░░░░░ me a chance to ░░░░░░░░ to your question HAWLEY ░░░░░░░░ s a yes or ░░░░░░░░ no it s not ░░░░░░░░ Have you fired anyone ░░░░░░░░ in the writing of ░░░░░░░░ outrageous memo about which ░░░░░░░░ you ve repeatedly misled ░░░░░░░░ public Yes or no ░░░░░░░░ The individuals involved in ░░░░░░░░ product were not HAWLEY ░░░░░░░░ you fired anyone Wray ░░░░░░░░ a minute were not ░░░░░░░░ to have engaged in ░░░░░░░░ intentional or bad faith ░░░░░░░░ And in fact in ░░░░░░░░ senator a number of ░░░░░░░░ individuals involved HAWLEY So ░░░░░░░░ answer is no Wray ░░░░░░░░ number of the individuals ░░░░░░░░ in writing that product ░░░░░░░░ the Richmond office were ░░░░░░░░ Catholics So the notion ░░░░░░░░ they were targeting their ░░░░░░░░ faith is nonsense HAWLEY ░░░░░░░░ oh they have a ░░░░░░░░ out of jail free ░░░░░░░░ I see I see ░░░░░░░░ you re immune and ░░░░░░░░ re immune Wray They ░░░░░░░░ did not say that ░░░░░░░░ So we shouldn t ░░░░░░░░ questions about it You ░░░░░░░░ t done a darn ░░░░░░░░ You haven t fired ░░░░░░░░ In fact what the ░░░░░░░░ found is what is ░░░░░░░░ You you admonished them ░░░░░░░░ were admonished and their ░░░░░░░░ supervisors were told to ░░░░░░░░ with the Human Resources ░░░░░░░░ to ensure that deficiencies ░░░░░░░░ addressed Oh I feel ░░░░░░░░ better They ve been ░░░░░░░░ to bed without food ░░░░░░░░ heavens director This is ░░░░░░░░ of the most outrageous ░░░░░░░░ You have mobilized your ░░░░░░░░ the most powerful law ░░░░░░░░ division in the world ░░░░░░░░ traditionalist Catholics whatever the ░░░░░░░░ that means and you ░░░░░░░░ just told us you ░░░░░░░░ have not fired a ░░░░░░░░ person Here it gets ░░░░░░░░ Your Richmond Field Office ░░░░░░░░ thought there was nothing ░░░░░░░░ with this The House ░░░░░░░░ the head of the ░░░░░░░░ Field office He testified ░░░░░░░░ s all here in ░░░░░░░░ public report I refer ░░░░░░░░ to it pages 12 ░░░░░░░░ 14 He testified he ░░░░░░░░ no problem with this ░░░░░░░░ said he thought it ░░░░░░░░ fine In fact we ░░░░░░░░ internal memoranda of the ░░░░░░░░ of the field office ░░░░░░░░ fiving One peer reviewer ░░░░░░░░ member of the field ░░░░░░░░ wrote I think this ░░░░░░░░ a great product I ░░░░░░░░ enjoyed the read Do ░░░░░░░░ have a problem with ░░░░░░░░ bigotry against Catholics in ░░░░░░░░ FBI Wray No HAWLEY ░░░░░░░░ are you going to ░░░░░░░░ about this Are you ░░░░░░░░ to fire these people ░░░░░░░░ not Wray Those individuals ░░░░░░░░ all been admonished and ░░░░░░░░ is all going into ░░░░░░░░ HAWLEY Admonished Wray if ░░░░░░░░ would let me finish ░░░░░░░░ answer it is all ░░░░░░░░ into their annual performance ░░░░░░░░ It has direct impact ░░░░░░░░ their compensation among other ░░░░░░░░ HAWLEY Oh I see ░░░░░░░░ I see I see ░░░░░░░░ the 60 million American ░░░░░░░░ who we now who ░░░░░░░░ learn that your FBI ░░░░░░░░ recommended that priests be ░░░░░░░░ as informants your FBI ░░░░░░░░ gone to priests choir ░░░░░░░░ but were to feel ░░░░░░░░ because you ve admonished ░░░░░░░░ for their wrongdoings Wray ░░░░░░░░ again are conflating two ░░░░░░░░ things When we are ░░░░░░░░ No I am not ░░░░░░░░ am taking your testimony ░░░░░░░░ you said you do ░░░░░░░░ you said categorically categorically ░░░░░░░░ said we do not ░░░░░░░░ do not go to ░░░░░░░░ and ask them about ░░░░░░░░ parishioners You said we ░░░░░░░░ not you didn t ░░░░░░░░ we haven t you ░░░░░░░░ t say we won ░░░░░░░░ you said we don ░░░░░░░░ It turns out you ░░░░░░░░ And you kept it ░░░░░░░░ the public You deliberately ░░░░░░░░ Congress about it And ░░░░░░░░ only reason we know ░░░░░░░░ it is because a ░░░░░░░░ came forward That s ░░░░░░░░ truth Wray I just ░░░░░░░░ s fundamentally disagree with ░░░░░░░░ characterization HAWLEY Well there ░░░░░░░░ no characterization The facts ░░░░░░░░ the facts And I ░░░░░░░░ resent the fact that ░░░░░░░░ have violated if not ░░░░░░░░ spirit if not the ░░░░░░░░ certainly the spirit of ░░░░░░░░ First Amendment and use ░░░░░░░░ law enforcement agency against ░░░░░░░░ in this nation.”
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.