Ingraham on Hunter Biden’s Press Speech: ‘’Not Financially Involved’ Seems Very Clintonian’

[Clip plays H Biden ░░░░░░░░ not financially involved in ░░░░░░░░ business because it did ░░░░░░░░ happen There is no ░░░░░░░░ or decency in what ░░░░░░░░ Republicans are doing Clip ░░░░░░░░ Ingraham He is reading ░░░░░░░░ remarks that his lawyers ░░░░░░░░ Joining me now Jonathan ░░░░░░░░ Fox News contributor and ░░░░░░░░ professor at George Washington ░░░░░░░░ He said there is ░░░░░░░░ evidence to support the ░░░░░░░░ first of all no ░░░░░░░░ And then he says ░░░░░░░░ phrase not financially involved ░░░░░░░░ father was not financially ░░░░░░░░ Professor that seems again ░░░░░░░░ Cintonian to me TURLEY ░░░░░░░░ it is We are ░░░░░░░░ the shifting rhetoric even ░░░░░░░░ the president himself He ░░░░░░░░ during the campaign that ░░░░░░░░ had no knowledge no ░░░░░░░░ with these business deals ░░░░░░░░ these associates of his ░░░░░░░░ That appears to be ░░░░░░░░ false We now know ░░░░░░░░ even Hunter s associates ░░░░░░░░ it was nonsense Hunter ░░░░░░░░ said his father had ░░░░░░░░ But you have the ░░░░░░░░ sort of caught in ░░░░░░░░ amber of this scandal ░░░░░░░░ he can t now ░░░░░░░░ what he told the ░░░░░░░░ over and over again ░░░░░░░░ Well financially involved could ░░░░░░░░ in his interpretation right ░░░░░░░░ Oh my father is ░░░░░░░░ running these businesses right ░░░░░░░░ is not directing their ░░░░░░░░ vis a vis the ░░░░░░░░ States Again that phrasing ░░░░░░░░ very Amorphous TURLEY Well ░░░░░░░░ s not just Amorphous ░░░░░░░░ s irrelevant You know ░░░░░░░░ Democrats have been stating ░░░░░░░░ there s no evidence ░░░░░░░░ the president benefited from ░░░░░░░░ payments That s nonsense ░░░░░░░░ mean there are federal ░░░░░░░░ on bribery and other ░░░░░░░░ where the courts have ░░░░░░░░ that payments to other ░░░░░░░░ members do constitutes benefits ░░░░░░░░ for those actual criminal ░░░░░░░░ It also implies an ░░░░░░░░ I represented the last ░░░░░░░░ impeached by Congress He ░░░░░░░░ charged with gifts that ░░░░░░░░ to his family So ░░░░░░░░ of that is just ░░░░░░░░ The question that we ░░░░░░░░ really looking at going ░░░░░░░░ is what did the ░░░░░░░░ know and what was ░░░░░░░░ involvement with this influence ░░░░░░░░ There is even Democrats ░░░░░░░░ the media now accept ░░░░░░░░ this was a massive ░░░░░░░░ peddling operation They are ░░░░░░░░ arguing that the president ░░░░░░░░ didn t know about ░░░░░░░░ Well how do you ░░░░░░░░ I mean that s ░░░░░░░░ point of an inquiry.”