Gabbard: Section 702 Loophole Lets Law Enforcement Search Americans’ Communications Without a Warrant

>> Tucker We have had ░░░░░░░░ Adam Schiff and swallow ░░░░░░░░ of California on this ░░░░░░░░ many times Both of ░░░░░░░░ proponents of the Russian ░░░░░░░░ They say they fear ░░░░░░░░ highest level of the ░░░░░░░░ government was penetrated by ░░░░░░░░ de facto Russian operative ░░░░░░░░ Well imagine now surprised ░░░░░░░░ were then to see ░░░░░░░░ both of them sc ░░░░░░░░ voted yet Sweeping powers ░░░░░░░░ modern even U S ░░░░░░░░ It s astonishing power ░░░░░░░░ reauthorize when the president ░░░░░░░░ you believe is a ░░░░░░░░ agent Cynical observer might ░░░░░░░░ conclude all this concern ░░░░░░░░ collusion is just theater ░░░░░░░░ reflecting their actual beliefs ░░░░░░░░ we are happy to ░░░░░░░░ their fears are genuine ░░░░░░░░ s vote wasn t ░░░░░░░░ It was Schiff and ░░░░░░░░ being irresponsible One Democrat ░░░░░░░░ did not vote to ░░░░░░░░ government mass surveillance of ░░░░░░░░ Why didn t you ░░░░░░░░ for this For a ░░░░░░░░ very simple reasons Section ░░░░░░░░ under this FISA act ░░░░░░░░ allows the U S ░░░░░░░░ to tap in to ░░░░░░░░ surveil communications of foreign ░░░░░░░░ on foreign soil This ░░░░░░░░ section 702 is something ░░░░░░░░ a veteran I understand ░░░░░░░░ important and is necessary ░░░░░░░░ retry to make sure ░░░░░░░░ our country is not ░░░░░░░░ by terrorists however there ░░░░░░░░ been and continues to ░░░░░░░░ a gapping loophole in ░░░░░░░░ that allows for law ░░░░░░░░ officials basically to search ░░░░░░░░ use the incidental communication ░░░░░░░░ American citizens that are ░░░░░░░░ up in this collection ░░░░░░░░ a warrant That s ░░░░░░░░ where the unconstitutional issue ░░░░░░░░ in why myself and ░░░░░░░░ believe 40 other members ░░░░░░░░ Congress Republican and Democrat ░░░░░░░░ an amendment that fixed ░░░░░░░░ loopholes that allowed this ░░░░░░░░ that provides this provision ░░░░░░░░ allows to you surveil ░░░░░░░░ targets on foreign soil ░░░░░░░░ sure we keep our ░░░░░░░░ safe but striking that ░░░░░░░░ protecting the rights of ░░░░░░░░ citizens so that they ░░░░░░░░ not being their communications ░░░░░░░░ not being searched or ░░░░░░░░ by law enforcement again ░░░░░░░░ a warrant Tucker Right ░░░░░░░░ s a bill of ░░░░░░░░ right That s a ░░░░░░░░ right Exactly Tucker Compound ░░░░░░░░ What else the argument ░░░░░░░░ that Why would anybody ░░░░░░░░ against that getting a ░░░░░░░░ for snooping and second ░░░░░░░░ was there no debate ░░░░░░░░ filtered down to the ░░░░░░░░ of us over this ░░░░░░░░ s a good question ░░░░░░░░ why there weren t ░░░░░░░░ people talking about the ░░░░░░░░ of this issue and ░░░░░░░░ is really at stake ░░░░░░░░ there was some debate ░░░░░░░░ happened on the house ░░░░░░░░ It was interesting because ░░░░░░░░ you Republican and democratic ░░░░░░░░ stepping up to protect ░░░░░░░░ status quo speaking out ░░░░░░░░ our U S A ░░░░░░░░ amendment And there were ░░░░░░░░ lot of misinformation and ░░░░░░░░ that were being said ░░░░░░░░ our amendment would do ░░░░░░░░ they didn t actually ░░░░░░░░ They said this will ░░░░░░░░ it so that our ░░░░░░░░ agencies can t go ░░░░░░░░ terrorists Point blank saying ░░░░░░░░ like that that simply ░░░░░░░░ not true The crafters ░░░░░░░░ the amendment were sure ░░░░░░░░ allow those provisions necessary ░░░░░░░░ prevent a tears terrorist ░░░░░░░░ but protected the constitutional ░░░░░░░░ of Americans Why would ░░░░░░░░ against this The intelligence ░░░░░░░░ agents came in time ░░░░░░░░ time again this program ░░░░░░░░ is purely for foreign ░░░░░░░░ on foreign soil Not ░░░░░░░░ Americans So it raised ░░░░░░░░ question that we never ░░░░░░░░ got answers to then ░░░░░░░░ would you oppose our ░░░░░░░░ Tucker Exactly this limit ░░░░░░░░ provide that check and ░░░░░░░░ due process probable cause ░░░░░░░░ a restaurant Tucker If ░░░░░░░░ give up your constitutional ░░░░░░░░ What s the point ░░░░░░░░ any of this That ░░░░░░░░ really the irony of ░░░░░░░░ situation When you look ░░░░░░░░ what terrorists want they ░░░░░░░░ Americans to they want ░░░░░░░░ to give up our ░░░░░░░░ They want us to ░░░░░░░░ up our freedoms And ░░░░░░░░ allowing this to continue ░░░░░░░░ fixing this unconstitutional loophole ░░░░░░░░ we are essentially ceding ░░░░░░░░ the terrorists win Tucker ░░░░░░░░ agree with that Thank ░░░░░░░░ aloha.