Rep. Nadler: ‘Absolutely’ Jeff Sessions Should Resign

>> Joining me now congressman ░░░░░░░░ Nadler a member of ░░░░░░░░ house Judiciary Committee sponsor ░░░░░░░░ the resolution of inquiry ░░░░░░░░ your Republican colleagues killed ░░░░░░░░ the Judiciary Committee during ░░░░░░░░ same day of the ░░░░░░░░ session Mr Page is ░░░░░░░░ of the people the ░░░░░░░░ York Times identified as ░░░░░░░░ being under investigation What ░░░░░░░░ the big questions you ░░░░░░░░ like you need to ░░░░░░░░ now There are two ░░░░░░░░ questions Number one Donald ░░░░░░░░ is belligerent to every ░░░░░░░░ country the French Japanese ░░░░░░░░ Mexicans Australians but he ░░░░░░░░ all over Vladimir Putin ░░░░░░░░ Russia It s onng ░░░░░░░░ say he should be ░░░░░░░░ another to fawn all ░░░░░░░░ What s going on ░░░░░░░░ Secondly what hold do ░░░░░░░░ have if any This ░░░░░░░░ out of character The ░░░░░░░░ thing is the Russians ░░░░░░░░ know tried to intervene ░░░░░░░░ the American election and ░░░░░░░░ to rig the election ░░░░░░░░ Hillary and in favor ░░░░░░░░ Trump we now know ░░░░░░░░ lot of Trump people ░░░░░░░░ in touch with Russians ░░░░░░░░ the Trump campaign Was ░░░░░░░░ Trump campaign colluding with ░░░░░░░░ Russians to subvert an ░░░░░░░░ election and was the ░░░░░░░░ colluding If that were ░░░░░░░░ case it would be ░░░░░░░░ of the most exclusive ░░░░░░░░ in American history right ░░░░░░░░ there s no evidence ░░░░░░░░ we have access to ░░░░░░░░ says that that s ░░░░░░░░ case Well there s ░░░░░░░░ lot of evidence that ░░░░░░░░ a the Russians tried ░░░░░░░░ subvert the election we ░░░░░░░░ that There s a ░░░░░░░░ of evidence that says ░░░░░░░░ people in the Trump ░░░░░░░░ the Trump campaign were ░░░░░░░░ to the Russian Maybe ░░░░░░░░ the intelligence agencies during ░░░░░░░░ time period they were ░░░░░░░░ to subvert the election ░░░░░░░░ s what we know ░░░░░░░░ What were they talking ░░░░░░░░ Were they doing it ░░░░░░░░ the knowledge or intent ░░░░░░░░ the candidate That we ░░░░░░░░ to find out What ░░░░░░░░ do you what documentation ░░░░░░░░ interviews under oath with ░░░░░░░░ do you feel like ░░░░░░░░ would need to have ░░░░░░░░ to to feel like ░░░░░░░░ could get to the ░░░░░░░░ of this Well obviously ░░░░░░░░ d want to put ░░░░░░░░ lot of people under ░░░░░░░░ the people in the ░░░░░░░░ campaign who talk to ░░░░░░░░ Russians You d want ░░░░░░░░ see the president s ░░░░░░░░ returns which would show ░░░░░░░░ whether he s be ░░░░░░░░ to Russian interests Whether ░░░░░░░░ gets a lot of ░░░░░░░░ He said recently he ░░░░░░░░ no funds from Russia ░░░░░░░░ the other hand his ░░░░░░░░ said a couple years ░░░░░░░░ money from pouring in ░░░░░░░░ Russia What s going ░░░░░░░░ there What kind of ░░░░░░░░ do they have if ░░░░░░░░ You want to see ░░░░░░░░ things You could theoretically ░░░░░░░░ compel the tax returns ░░░░░░░░ that was voted down ░░░░░░░░ Republicans also in committee ░░░░░░░░ the ways and means ░░░░░░░░ But that s something ░░░░░░░░ the Congress could compel ░░░░░░░░ tax returns Is that ░░░░░░░░ they could do Absolutely ░░░░░░░░ can and should It ░░░░░░░░ been a norm of ░░░░░░░░ democracy for the last ░░░░░░░░ or 60 years He ░░░░░░░░ t show it with ░░░░░░░░ ridiculous excuse about N ░░░░░░░░ We don t even ░░░░░░░░ if there was We ░░░░░░░░ to see that information ░░░░░░░░ think as more and ░░░░░░░░ things come out about ░░░░░░░░ close he is to ░░░░░░░░ Russians for no apparent ░░░░░░░░ about more and more ░░░░░░░░ about people having talked ░░░░░░░░ not talked to the ░░░░░░░░ pressure is building up ░░░░░░░░ get this out.
>