To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Issa Addresses Reporters Outside IRS Hearing After Outburst From Cummings
Subjects
Source
Fox News Channel (FNC)

Name: Fox News Channel (FNC)
URL: https://www.foxnews.com
Show
–
Persons
Darrell Issa

Name: Darrell Issa
Employment: U.S. Congress
Position: Representative
Event
Event location
Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.

Name: Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.
URL: http://www.visitthecapitol.gov/
Link
Not online media
Uploaded
03/05/2014 10:10 am
Owner
Member deleted, inactive, or not public
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (426x240)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:07:05
Views
6
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
we had a hearing ░░░░░░░░ in the committee in ░░░░░░░░ we asked miss learner ░░░░░░░░ lawyer indicated under certain ░░░░░░░░ she would testify she ░░░░░░░░ testify after an exhaustive ░░░░░░░░ questions i determined that ░░░░░░░░ was not under any ░░░░░░░░ going to testify and ░░░░░░░░ to an already completed ░░░░░░░░ other than her testimony ░░░░░░░░ adjourned at this point ░░░░░░░░ ll continue our investigation ░░░░░░░░ the IRS targeting of ░░░░░░░░ groups without the testimony ░░░░░░░░ miss lerner are there ░░░░░░░░ questions there were no ░░░░░░░░ was not directing questions ░░░░░░░░ the witness and the ░░░░░░░░ committee had already adjourned ░░░░░░░░ to the committee we ░░░░░░░░ only to determine whether ░░░░░░░░ not we could get ░░░░░░░░ to give testimony once ░░░░░░░░ was determined she would ░░░░░░░░ give testimony there was ░░░░░░░░ question before us Mr ░░░░░░░░ did not raise a ░░░░░░░░ of privilege or point ░░░░░░░░ order and in fact ░░░░░░░░ did recognized him when ░░░░░░░░ said he had a ░░░░░░░░ he went into an ░░░░░░░░ statement opening statements had ░░░░░░░░ been completed there were ░░░░░░░░ members sitting at the ░░░░░░░░ and we had already ░░░░░░░░ i left because there ░░░░░░░░ no question pending he ░░░░░░░░ talking into a Mike ░░░░░░░░ an adjourned meeting the ░░░░░░░░ is Mr cummings came ░░░░░░░░ make a point of ░░░░░░░░ objections to the process ░░░░░░░░ have been going through ░░░░░░░░ was actually slandering me ░░░░░░░░ the moment that the ░░░░░░░░ did go off by ░░░░░░░░ this had not been ░░░░░░░░ real investigation this has ░░░░░░░░ a bipartisan investigation by ░░░░░░░░ committees in which we ░░░░░░░░ testimony in multiple hearing ░░░░░░░░ in Jordan s sub ░░░░░░░░ in which it was ░░░░░░░░ there was targeting of ░░░░░░░░ groups in which there ░░░░░░░░ people who were acting ░░░░░░░░ the norm we are ░░░░░░░░ to continue our investigation ░░░░░░░░ just because Mr cummings ░░░░░░░░ like to have a ░░░░░░░░ convenient truth doesn t ░░░░░░░░ him the right to ░░░░░░░░ a speech i went ░░░░░░░░ a process of asking ░░░░░░░░ to determine whether miss ░░░░░░░░ would testify she made ░░░░░░░░ clear through multiple questions ░░░░░░░░ she dot and she ░░░░░░░░ not do it with ░░░░░░░░ delay her attorney asked ░░░░░░░░ i have exhausted any ░░░░░░░░ of her speaking at ░░░░░░░░ point we have attempted ░░░░░░░░ ways including it making ░░░░░░░░ clear we could do ░░░░░░░░ one week delay they ░░░░░░░░ their you mind and ░░░░░░░░ that Mr Jordan has ░░░░░░░░ work to do inaudible ░░░░░░░░ s something that has ░░░░░░░░ be considered we have ░░░░░░░░ looking for the truth ░░░░░░░░ lerner in light of ░░░░░░░░ emails that are before ░░░░░░░░ Democrats and Republicans have ░░░░░░░░ same things we asked ░░░░░░░░ on today we hope ░░░░░░░░ get answers from her ░░░░░░░░ it s clear for ░░░░░░░░ why did she ask ░░░░░░░░ crossroads gps application scrutinized ░░░░░░░░ name we ll probably ░░░░░░░░ know that because that ░░░░░░░░ something in her mind ░░░░░░░░ said after she established ░░░░░░░░ wasn t going to ░░░░░░░░ you still asked several ░░░░░░░░ and you did not ░░░░░░░░ your democratic colleague that ░░░░░░░░ opportunities he was not ░░░░░░░░ to ask any questions ░░░░░░░░ cummings says he had ░░░░░░░░ to ask instead he ░░░░░░░░ making an opening statement ░░░░░░░░ after the committee had ░░░░░░░░ adjourned how much much ░░░░░░░░ is a political play ░░░░░░░░ Republicans in the election ░░░░░░░░ not a smidgen of ░░░░░░░░ not a smidgen of ░░░░░░░░ the fact is this ░░░░░░░░ is something the president ░░░░░░░░ came out outraged against ░░░░░░░░ we were as we ░░░░░░░░ our investigation we discovered ░░░░░░░░ was clear differential treatment ░░░░░░░░ conservative groups particularly if ░░░░░░░░ nameluded patriot or tea ░░░░░░░░ and the administration has ░░░░░░░░ from supportive of this ░░░░░░░░ behavior when they said ░░░░░░░░ was in cincinnati to ░░░░░░░░ it saying there wasn ░░░░░░░░ a smidgen of evidence ░░░░░░░░ is a concern inaudible ░░░░░░░░ have no idea what ░░░░░░░░ in the minds of ░░░░░░░░ other than the ones ░░░░░░░░ this committee the ones ░░░░░░░░ this committee have sat ░░░░░░░░ hearings reviewed information and ░░░░░░░░ prepared to continue the ░░░░░░░░ any other questions how ░░░░░░░░ a setback is this ░░░░░░░░ you can see from ░░░░░░░░ questioning today we continued ░░░░░░░░ gather facts around miss ░░░░░░░░ s absence of testimony ░░░░░░░░ would have aloud us ░░░░░░░░ bring this investigation to ░░░░░░░░ pretty quick close if ░░░░░░░░ had been willing to ░░░░░░░░ to questions without it ░░░░░░░░ ll have a few ░░░░░░░░ to find out on ░░░░░░░░ she could have answered ░░░░░░░░ today it may well ░░░░░░░░ we have got on ░░░░░░░░ bottom of it at ░░░░░░░░ point roads lead to ░░░░░░░░ learner the witness to ░░░░░░░░ the fifth that becomes ░░░░░░░░ becomes one of the ░░░░░░░░ characters at this point ░░░░░░░░ she been willing to ░░░░░░░░ those emails which were ░░░░░░░░ through separate subpoenas then ░░░░░░░░ could have perhaps brought ░░░░░░░░ to a close without ░░░░░░░░ it may dead end ░░░░░░░░ miss lerner question inaudible ░░░░░░░░ ll confer afterwards i ░░░░░░░░ Mr cummings would like ░░░░░░░░ we are going to ░░░░░░░░ are going to there ░░░░░░░░ cameras everywhere we will ░░░░░░░░ to see our next ░░░░░░░░ but miss lerner is ░░░░░░░░ our pry police officery ░░░░░░░░ today nor is the ░░░░░░░░ are going to continue ░░░░░░░░ lerner is not our ░░░░░░░░ concern you asked a ░░░░░░░░ earlier do you think ░░░░░░░░ is going to testify ░░░░░░░░ have less than likely ░░░░░░░░ there is in fact ░░░░░░░░ possibility that given a ░░░░░░░░ judge s order she ░░░░░░░░ testify so we ll ░░░░░░░░ to consider all those ░░░░░░░░ of whether there is ░░░░░░░░ way to get testimony ░░░░░░░░ a key character who ░░░░░░░░ clearly had information and ...
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.




