To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
YouTube CEO Wants Governments Pass Laws to ‘Have More Control Over Online Speech’ (clip) (clip)
Source
YouTube

Name: YouTube
URL: http://www.youtube.com/
Show
–
Persons
Susan Wojcicki
Name: Susan Wojcicki
Event
Event location
–
Uploaded
02/16/2022 02:27 pm
Owner
Member deleted, inactive, or not public
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (1920x1080)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:00:53
Views
1
Purchases
1
Transcript
You ve mentioned this ░░░░░░░░ important that that you ░░░░░░░░ yourself that is the ░░░░░░░░ position that that you ░░░░░░░░ have that youtube has ░░░░░░░░ how to deal with ░░░░░░░░ content whether it s ░░░░░░░░ to demonetize it um ░░░░░░░░ on the jurisdiction you ░░░░░░░░ in you know in ░░░░░░░░ countries uh like Germany ░░░░░░░░ courts have taken a ░░░░░░░░ rather strong position on ░░░░░░░░ the limits of what ░░░░░░░░ uh can do whether ░░░░░░░░ must not act arbitrarily ░░░░░░░░ that they have to ░░░░░░░░ to their their their ░░░░░░░░ and implement them so ░░░░░░░░ um how how does ░░░░░░░░ that work in practice ░░░░░░░░ perhaps can can elaborate ░░░░░░░░ bit on that how ░░░░░░░░ you make sure that ░░░░░░░░ light of the many ░░░░░░░░ jurisdictions out there you ░░░░░░░░ you navigate this this ░░░░░░░░ this this minefield between ░░░░░░░░ national jurisdictions between keeping ░░░░░░░░ advertisers happy between keeping ░░░░░░░░ interested sure sure no ░░░░░░░░ great question uh well ░░░░░░░░ of all I ll ░░░░░░░░ that for uh you ░░░░░░░░ we we work around ░░░░░░░░ globe and you re ░░░░░░░░ certainly there are many ░░░░░░░░ laws in many different ░░░░░░░░ and we um we ░░░░░░░░ the laws of the ░░░░░░░░ jurisdictions around speech or ░░░░░░░░ s considered safe or ░░░░░░░░ safe um that s ░░░░░░░░ for for democratically elected ░░░░░░░░ um it might get ░░░░░░░░ little bit more complicated ░░░░░░░░ in non democratically elected ░░░░░░░░ um and and for ░░░░░░░░ most part you know ░░░░░░░░ basically we we enforce ░░░░░░░░ laws um that actually ░░░░░░░░ t been the controversial ░░░░░░░░ what has been the ░░░░░░░░ part has been when ░░░░░░░░ is content that would ░░░░░░░░ deemed as harmful but ░░░░░░░░ is not illegal um ░░░░░░░░ an example of that ░░░░░░░░ example would be kovid ░░░░░░░░ m not aware of ░░░░░░░░ being laws by government ░░░░░░░░ around coven in terms ░░░░░░░░ not being able to ░░░░░░░░ the efficacy of masks ░░░░░░░░ where the virus came ░░░░░░░░ or the right treatment ░░░░░░░░ proposal but yet there ░░░░░░░░ a lot of pressure ░░░░░░░░ concern about us distributing ░░░░░░░░ that went against what ░░░░░░░░ considered the standard and ░░░░░░░░ medical knowledge um and ░░░░░░░░ this category of harmful ░░░░░░░░ not um but but ░░░░░░░░ has been I think ░░░░░░░░ most of the discussion ░░░░░░░░ been and you know ░░░░░░░░ us we look at ░░░░░░░░ content and we think ░░░░░░░░ the the role that ░░░░░░░░ play in society um ░░░░░░░░ want to be doing ░░░░░░░░ right thing for our ░░░░░░░░ and for our creators ░░░░░░░░ also generate revenue from ░░░░░░░░ and if we are ░░░░░░░░ content that is seen ░░░░░░░░ our advertising community as ░░░░░░░░ benefiting society no advertiser ░░░░░░░░ going to want to ░░░░░░░░ on that and they ░░░░░░░░ certainly not going to ░░░░░░░░ want to appear on ░░░░░░░░ different you know content ░░░░░░░░ is positive if they ░░░░░░░░ the platform as a ░░░░░░░░ is not being responsible ░░░░░░░░ we are generally very ░░░░░░░░ responsibility is really is ░░░░░░░░ for our business and ░░░░░░░░ uh you know we ░░░░░░░░ over two million creators ░░░░░░░░ our platform that we ░░░░░░░░ revenue with so if ░░░░░░░░ re not generating revenue ░░░░░░░░ them then you know ░░░░░░░░ s a problem for ░░░░░░░░ creators um they create ░░░░░░░░ and incredible content and ░░░░░░░░ share the majority of ░░░░░░░░ with them so um ░░░░░░░░ so basically that s ░░░░░░░░ you know so I ░░░░░░░░ governments like can can ░░░░░░░░ you know our recommendation ░░░░░░░░ governments want to have ░░░░░░░░ control over online speech ░░░░░░░░ to to pass laws ░░░░░░░░ have that be very ░░░░░░░░ and clearly defined such ░░░░░░░░ we can implement it ░░░░░░░░ are times that we ░░░░░░░░ the laws being implemented ░░░░░░░░ being suggested that they ░░░░░░░░ they re not necessarily ░░░░░░░░ or possible for us ░░░░░░░░ cleanly interpret them um ░░░░░░░░ we ve also seen ░░░░░░░░ there s laws passed ░░░░░░░░ for the internet as ░░░░░░░░ to for all speech ░░░░░░░░ and I do think ░░░░░░░░ s a dangerous area ░░░░░░░░ we start to get ░░░░░░░░ and say oh sure ░░░░░░░░ could say something like ░░░░░░░░ in a magazine or ░░░░░░░░ TV but you can ░░░░░░░░ say it on the ░░░░░░░░ You ve mentioned this ░░░░░░░░ important that that you ░░░░░░░░ yourself that is the ░░░░░░░░ position that that you ░░░░░░░░ have that youtube has ░░░░░░░░ how to deal with ░░░░░░░░ content whether it s ░░░░░░░░ to demonetize it um ░░░░░░░░ on the jurisdiction you ░░░░░░░░ in you know in ░░░░░░░░ countries uh like Germany ░░░░░░░░ courts have taken a ░░░░░░░░ rather strong position on ░░░░░░░░ the limits of what ░░░░░░░░ uh can do whether ░░░░░░░░ must not act arbitrarily ░░░░░░░░ that they have to ░░░░░░░░ to their their their ░░░░░░░░ and implement them so ░░░░░░░░ um how how does ░░░░░░░░ that work in practice ░░░░░░░░ perhaps can can elaborate ░░░░░░░░ bit on that how ░░░░░░░░ you make sure that ░░░░░░░░ light of the many ░░░░░░░░ jurisdictions out there you ░░░░░░░░ you navigate this this ░░░░░░░░ this this minefield between ░░░░░░░░ national jurisdictions between keeping ░░░░░░░░ advertisers happy between keeping ░░░░░░░░ interested sure sure no ░░░░░░░░ great question uh well ░░░░░░░░ of all I ll ░░░░░░░░ that for uh you ░░░░░░░░ we we work around ░░░░░░░░ globe and you re ░░░░░░░░ certainly there are many ░░░░░░░░ laws in many different ░░░░░░░░ and we um we ░░░░░░░░ the laws of the ░░░░░░░░ jurisdictions around speech or ░░░░░░░░ s considered safe or ░░░░░░░░ safe um that s ░░░░░░░░ for for democratically elected ░░░░░░░░ um it might get ░░░░░░░░ little bit more complicated ░░░░░░░░ in non democratically elected ░░░░░░░░ um and and for ░░░░░░░░ most part you know ░░░░░░░░ basically we we enforce ░░░░░░░░ laws um that actually ░░░░░░░░ t been the controversial ░░░░░░░░ what has been the ░░░░░░░░ part has been when ░░░░░░░░ is content that would ░░░░░░░░ deemed as harmful but ░░░░░░░░ is not illegal um ░░░░░░░░ an example of that ░░░░░░░░ example would be kovid ░░░░░░░░ m not aware of ░░░░░░░░ being laws by government ░░░░░░░░ around coven in terms ░░░░░░░░ not being able to ░░░░░░░░ the efficacy of masks ░░░░░░░░ where the virus came ░░░░░░░░ or the right treatment ░░░░░░░░ proposal but yet there ░░░░░░░░ a lot of pressure ░░░░░░░░ concern about us distributing ░░░░░░░░ that went against what ░░░░░░░░ considered the standard and ░░░░░░░░ medical knowledge um and ░░░░░░░░ this category of harmful ░░░░░░░░ not um but but ░░░░░░░░ has been I think ░░░░░░░░ most of the discussion ░░░░░░░░ been and you know ░░░░░░░░ us we look at ░░░░░░░░ content and we think ░░░░░░░░ the the role that ░░░░░░░░ play in society um ░░░░░░░░ want to be doing ░░░░░░░░ right thing for our ░░░░░░░░ and for our creators ░░░░░░░░ also generate revenue from ░░░░░░░░ and if we are ░░░░░░░░ content that is seen ░░░░░░░░ our advertising community as ░░░░░░░░ benefiting society no advertiser ░░░░░░░░ going to want to ░░░░░░░░ on that and they ░░░░░░░░ certainly not going to ░░░░░░░░ want to appear on ░░░░░░░░ different you know content ░░░░░░░░ is positive if they ░░░░░░░░ the platform as a ░░░░░░░░ is not being responsible ░░░░░░░░ we are generally very ░░░░░░░░ responsibility is really is ░░░░░░░░ for our business and ░░░░░░░░ uh you know we ░░░░░░░░ over two million creators ░░░░░░░░ our platform that we ░░░░░░░░ revenue with so if ░░░░░░░░ re not generating revenue ░░░░░░░░ them then you know ░░░░░░░░ s a problem for ░░░░░░░░ creators um they create ░░░░░░░░ and incredible content and ░░░░░░░░ share the majority of ░░░░░░░░ with them so um ░░░░░░░░ so basically that s ░░░░░░░░ you know so I ░░░░░░░░ governments like can can ░░░░░░░░ you know our recommendation ░░░░░░░░ governments want to have ░░░░░░░░ control over online speech ░░░░░░░░ to to pass laws ░░░░░░░░ have that be very ░░░░░░░░ and clearly defined such ░░░░░░░░ we can implement it ░░░░░░░░ are times that we ░░░░░░░░ the laws being implemented ░░░░░░░░ being suggested that they ░░░░░░░░ they re not necessarily ░░░░░░░░ or possible for us ░░░░░░░░ cleanly interpret them um ░░░░░░░░ we ve also seen ░░░░░░░░ there s laws passed ░░░░░░░░ for the internet as ░░░░░░░░ to for all speech ░░░░░░░░ and I do think ░░░░░░░░ s a dangerous area ░░░░░░░░ we start to get ░░░░░░░░ and say oh sure ░░░░░░░░ could say something like ░░░░░░░░ in a magazine or ░░░░░░░░ TV but you can ░░░░░░░░ say it on the internet
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.