Chair would recognize the ░░░░░░░░ from the great state ░░░░░░░░ Michigan We are from ░░░░░░░░ registered and I thank ░░░░░░░░ for your first was ░░░░░░░░ At the here I ░░░░░░░░ this bill Last year ░░░░░░░░ agreed with the sponsors ░░░░░░░░ we should provide clarity ░░░░░░░░ he fears authority to ░░░░░░░░ greenhouse gases However is ░░░░░░░░ ve seen often in ░░░░░░░░ last three years Legislation ░░░░░░░░ us does nothing to ░░░░░░░░ the underlying problem and ░░░░░░░░ simply blocks EPA from ░░░░░░░░ action without providing any ░░░░░░░░ solution Like most members ░░░░░░░░ this committee I think ░░░░░░░░ Supreme Court gave up ░░░░░░░░ a very much a ░░░░░░░░ is decision on whether ░░░░░░░░ clean air act covers ░░░░░░░░ gases Like many the ░░░░░░░░ of this committee I ░░░░░░░░ present when we wrote ░░░░░░░░ legislation and we thought ░░░░░░░░ was clear enough but ░░░░░░░░ did not The we ░░░░░░░░ t clarify thinking that ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court was ░░░░░░░░ stupid enough to make ░░░░░░░░ find It in any ░░░░░░░░ my first problem with ░░░░░░░░ legislation is it creates ░░░░░░░░ peculiar and entirely due ░░░░░░░░ Regulations under the clean ░░░░░░░░ act more complications more ░░░░░░░░ The bill would take ░░░░░░░░ long established should reasonably ░░░░░░░░ regulatory process And turned ░░░░░░░░ upside down A great ░░░░░░░░ of all those it ░░░░░░░░ who are say he ░░░░░░░░ Certainly this is gonna ░░░░░░░░ up Almost every industry ░░░░░░░░ bill what is a ░░░░░░░░ matter eliminates a delegation ░░░░░░░░ rule making authority to ░░░░░░░░ and such a carver ░░░░░░░░ up as a regulatory ░░░░░░░░ subs English We try ░░░░░░░░ do really to avoid ░░░░░░░░ what we wrote to ░░░░░░░░ air act Traditionally the ░░░░░░░░ of this could any ░░░░░░░░ give us the EPA ░░░░░░░░ authority to develop regulations ░░░░░░░░ address particular particular issues ░░░░░░░░ m concerned that we ░░░░░░░░ be setting you re ░░░░░░░░ us edit that allows ░░░░░░░░ to be set without ░░░░░░░░ public comments or technical ░░░░░░░░ from industry to stay ░░░░░░░░ Traditionally the Congress has ░░░░░░░░ responsibility to regulate the ░░░░░░░░ life EPA We are ░░░░░░░░ that true addition Second ░░░░░░░░ we have seen time ░░░░░░░░ time again from this ░░░░░░░░ the attempts To address ░░░░░░░░ issue Without of dealing ░░░░░░░░ the utter lie law ░░░░░░░░ the underlying problems What ░░░░░░░░ needed here now Is ░░░░░░░░ careful consideration of air ░░░░░░░░ and a proper addressee ░░░░░░░░ the matter The bill ░░░░░░░░ not have been deflate ░░░░░░░░ to address the issue ░░░░░░░░ If we want to ░░░░░░░░ legislate this issue and ░░░░░░░░ subsidy it could be ░░░░░░░░ by the president I ░░░░░░░░ everyone would agree we ░░░░░░░░ to have more here ░░░░░░░░ where out incorporate view ░░░░░░░░ from industry as well ░░░░░░░░ the environmentalists I don ░░░░░░░░ see anything here an ░░░░░░░░ to compromise or is ░░░░░░░░ hour to achieve and ░░░░░░░░ a solution to a ░░░░░░░░ real problem Once again ░░░░░░░░ have a bill before ░░░░░░░░ that will press was ░░░░░░░░ no bipartisan support Not ░░░░░░░░ to pass the Senate ░░░░░░░░ it will not be ░░░░░░░░ by the president In ░░░░░░░░ word we are wasting ░░░░░░░░ time of this community ░░░░░░░░ all the members instead ░░░░░░░░ this is an election ░░░░░░░░ but I do believe ░░░░░░░░ we should instead be ░░░░░░░░ to find workable solutions ░░░░░░░░ could make meaningful that ░░░░░░░░ change not just for ░░░░░░░░ talking points we re ░░░░░░░░ enough of those celeste ░░░░░░░░ country for a thousand ░░░░░░░░ All too often I ░░░░░░░░ the ragged radical approaches ░░░░░░░░ flows in the Congress ░░░░░░░░ in this committee over ░░░░░░░░ past few years will ░░░░░░░░ nothing except create for ░░░░░░░░ and more problems This ░░░░░░░░ I think is one ░░░░░░░░ those from one of ░░░░░░░░ proposals Happily we will ░░░░░░░░ saved by the Senate ░░░░░░░░ The presence a your ░░░░░░░░ the of I time