Jordan Sekulow on Travel Ban Rulings: SCOTUS Is Clear You Don’t Look Behind the Text of the Order

[excerpt BREAM Okay so ░░░░░░░░ have three different petitions ░░░░░░░░ won t get too ░░░░░░░░ into the weeds of ░░░░░░░░ Essentially this is now ░░░░░░░░ the Supreme Court s ░░░░░░░░ I want to read ░░░░░░░░ little bit of what ░░░░░░░░ judge who ruled against ░░░░░░░░ in one of the ░░░░░░░░ courts and was joined ░░░░░░░░ several other judges in ░░░░░░░░ of opinion said about ░░░░░░░░ thing Instead of looking ░░░░░░░░ the text they considered ░░░░░░░░ the President had said ░░░░░░░░ the campaign trail and ░░░░░░░░ others connected to the ░░░░░░░░ have said He said ░░░░░░░░ The order speaks with ░░░░░░░░ words of national security ░░░░░░░░ in context drips with ░░░░░░░░ intolerance animus and discrimination ░░░░░░░░ response SEKULOW This is ░░░░░░░░ to how the court ░░░░░░░░ decide really on the ░░░░░░░░ of this case I ░░░░░░░░ believe the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ t have to take ░░░░░░░░ case but when it ░░░░░░░░ to presidential power it ░░░░░░░░ very likely that it ░░░░░░░░ That bigger part of ░░░░░░░░ case will probably be ░░░░░░░░ in the fall sometime ░░░░░░░░ And the question will ░░░░░░░░ did these statements by ░░░░░░░░ associates by President Trump ░░░░░░░░ the campaign trail as ░░░░░░░░ politician before serving in ░░░░░░░░ government before governing and ░░░░░░░░ this executive order have ░░░░░░░░ to do with the ░░░░░░░░ text And when you ░░░░░░░░ at Supreme Court precedent ░░░░░░░░ these circuit courts and ░░░░░░░░ courts the Supreme Court ░░░░░░░░ is pretty clear you ░░░░░░░░ t look behind the ░░░░░░░░ challenge the text of ░░░░░░░░ executive order And even ░░░░░░░░ judges that ruled against ░░░░░░░░ executive order and found ░░░░░░░░ unconstitutional they all admitted ░░░░░░░░ its face it is ░░░░░░░░ You even had lawyers ░░░░░░░░ court saying they were ░░░░░░░░ to this saying if ░░░░░░░░ wasn t Donald Trump ░░░░░░░░ put it through that ░░░░░░░░ would hold it constitutional ░░░░░░░░ that they wouldn t ░░░░░░░░ be challenging it in ░░░░░░░░ The big question Shannon ░░░░░░░░ immediate question will be ░░░░░░░░ stay We have two ░░░░░░░░ requested here on the ░░░░░░░░ that have gone into ░░░░░░░░ One in the ninth ░░░░░░░░ in the fourth You ░░░░░░░░ have individual justices It ░░░░░░░░ be Justice Kennedy for ░░░░░░░░ ninth Chief Justice Roberts ░░░░░░░░ the fourth or five ░░░░░░░░ that could be referred ░░░░░░░░ the entire court and ░░░░░░░░ could have this order ░░░░░░░░ into effect literally in ░░░░░░░░ from now There is ░░░░░░░░ timeline for how quickly ░░░░░░░░ stay can happen It ░░░░░░░░ be denied as well ░░░░░░░░ doesn t mean the ░░░░░░░░ Administration has lost.”