To access this clip without audiomarks, please purchase it, or upgrade your account.
Date
Summary
Alberto Gonzales on Bergdahl: ‘It’s Clear the President Did Not Comply With the Law’
Subjects
Source
Fox News Channel (FNC)

Name: Fox News Channel (FNC)
URL: https://www.foxnews.com
Show
America’s Newsroom

Name: America’s Newsroom
URL: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/americas-newsroom/index.html
Persons
Bill Hemmer
, Alberto Gonzales

Name: Bill Hemmer
Employment: Fox News
Position: Co-Anchor

Name: Alberto Gonzales
Employment: Belmont University
Position: Professor
Event
Event location
–
Link
Not online media
Uploaded
06/05/2014 08:33 am
Owner
Member deleted, inactive, or not public
Type
Video
Format
MP4 (426x240)
Use clipper to adjust file type
Duration
0:05:34
Views
5
Purchases
0
Social views
0
Transcript
is the ambition to ░░░░░░░░ gitmo is that ambition ░░░░░░░░ i don t think ░░░░░░░░ s dead the president ░░░░░░░░ on record that he ░░░░░░░░ to i think it ░░░░░░░░ a mistake the first ░░░░░░░░ for the president to ░░░░░░░░ i m going to ░░░░░░░░ guantanamo i think he ░░░░░░░░ the see it closed ░░░░░░░░ i m afraid that ░░░░░░░░ be part of the ░░░░░░░░ for transfer bill does ░░░░░░░░ make it more difficult ░░░░░░░░ do this in the ░░░░░░░░ 2 2 1 2 ░░░░░░░░ you change U S ░░░░░░░░ toward detainees and you ░░░░░░░░ away from gitmo and ░░░░░░░░ them in courtrooms in ░░░░░░░░ Manhattan what s your ░░░░░░░░ on that i think ░░░░░░░░ s a possibility my ░░░░░░░░ has been we need ░░░░░░░░ give the commander in ░░░░░░░░ as many options as ░░░░░░░░ to deal with terrorists ░░░░░░░░ may be to subject ░░░░░░░░ to military commissions or ░░░░░░░░ them into our criminal ░░░░░░░░ system i think it ░░░░░░░░ important for the commander ░░░░░░░░ chief to have all ░░░░░░░░ possible bill now we ░░░░░░░░ about the law and ░░░░░░░░ 30 day notice that ░░░░░░░░ did not go to ░░░░░░░░ member of Congress what ░░░░░░░░ emerging is an imperial ░░░░░░░░ an uber presidency where ░░░░░░░░ president can act unilaterally ░░░░░░░░ is only the latest ░░░░░░░░ of that bill i ░░░░░░░░ t think you disagree ░░░░░░░░ that i try to ░░░░░░░░ at this thing in ░░░░░░░░ fair and objective way ░░░░░░░░ which the critics of ░░░░░░░░ George w bush never ░░░░░░░░ as to whether the ░░░░░░░░ is unconstitutional that s ░░░░░░░░ gray area let s ░░░░░░░░ the president had the ░░░░░░░░ to do this there ░░░░░░░░ a legitimate question whether ░░░░░░░░ was a good deal ░░░░░░░░ the United States i ░░░░░░░░ a great deal of ░░░░░░░░ about the people we ░░░░░░░░ in guantanamo bay we ░░░░░░░░ them there for a ░░░░░░░░ and we release them ░░░░░░░░ assurances they are not ░░░░░░░░ come back and fight ░░░░░░░░ the United States bill ░░░░░░░░ do you think he ░░░░░░░░ it what s your ░░░░░░░░ on that i don ░░░░░░░░ know the president you ░░░░░░░░ to know the president ░░░░░░░░ how they make decisions ░░░░░░░░ s important to them ░░░░░░░░ what motivates them this ░░░░░░░░ his objective early on ░░░░░░░░ his administration i think ░░░░░░░░ miscalculated the reaction to ░░░░░░░░ way he did it ░░░░░░░░ reaction from Congress and ░░░░░░░░ American people i think ░░░░░░░░ miscalculated the reaction from ░░░░░░░░ s former come rads ░░░░░░░░ the field bill what ░░░░░░░░ you think about the ░░░░░░░░ that ultimately he wants ░░░░░░░░ change American policy as ░░░░░░░░ pertains to detainees get ░░░░░░░░ out of the gitmo ░░░░░░░░ close the things down ░░░░░░░░ hold neferg the future ░░░░░░░░ an American courtroom i ░░░░░░░░ military commissions exist for ░░░░░░░░ reason they are helpful ░░░░░░░░ bring people to justice ░░░░░░░░ are consistent with the ░░░░░░░░ of law they allow ░░░░░░░░ to bring people to ░░░░░░░░ without the risk to ░░░░░░░░ civic population like in ░░░░░░░░ York City would present ░░░░░░░░ think that s a ░░░░░░░░ option for the United ░░░░░░░░ in bringing terrorists to ░░░░░░░░ i disagree with the ░░░░░░░░ to take this option ░░░░░░░░ the table bill if ░░░░░░░░ signed the law two ░░░░░░░░ ago whatever the time ░░░░░░░░ was 2 1 2 ░░░░░░░░ ago that required you ░░░░░░░░ notify congress30 days before ░░░░░░░░ leaves gitmo why do ░░░░░░░░ by you bypass that ░░░░░░░░ knew the law was ░░░░░░░░ the books why do ░░░░░░░░ make that move the ░░░░░░░░ did issue a signed ░░░░░░░░ i think they thought ░░░░░░░░ Congress would hinder the ░░░░░░░░ of the commander in ░░░░░░░░ to handle someone captured ░░░░░░░░ the battlefield i think ░░░░░░░░ knew this was a ░░░░░░░░ and obviously you want ░░░░░░░░ sign a bill because ░░░░░░░░ includes very important provisions ░░░░░░░░ don t want to ░░░░░░░░ it but you inform ░░░░░░░░ Congress you inform the ░░░░░░░░ that bill but as ░░░░░░░░ know that did not ░░░░░░░░ here final question is ░░░░░░░░ because you are afraid ░░░░░░░░ is going come back ░░░░░░░░ say you can t ░░░░░░░░ this deal clearly the ░░░░░░░░ day notice is to ░░░░░░░░ Congress to provide input ░░░░░░░░ remember the statute does ░░░░░░░░ require Congress to approve ░░░░░░░░ the transfer it requires ░░░░░░░░ be notified so Congress ░░░░░░░░ s possible after notification ░░░░░░░░ could generate public opposition ░░░░░░░░ would try to pass ░░░░░░░░ bill to prevent transfer. ...
To view this clip's transcript, log into your Grabien account.




