Pressed on Family Financial Ties to Critical Race Theory, Garland Refuses to Commit to Ethics Review

RUSH TRANSCRIPT That is ░░░░░░░░ Many of those parents ░░░░░░░░ are shown up these ░░░░░░░░ were means that the ░░░░░░░░ basis of their objection ░░░░░░░░ their vigorous debate as ░░░░░░░░ mentioned earlier is the ░░░░░░░░ the very curricula that ░░░░░░░░ son in law is ░░░░░░░░ So to millions of ░░░░░░░░ I mean my constituents ░░░░░░░░ was home all weekend ░░░░░░░░ an earful about this ░░░░░░░░ re very concerned about ░░░░░░░░ sub Part ii of ░░░░░░░░ federal regulation says an ░░░░░░░░ of the executive Branch ░░░░░░░░ discouraged from encouraging cunt ░░░░░░░░ engaging in conduct this ░░░░░░░░ to affect the financial ░░░░░░░░ of someone close to ░░░░░░░░ you re you re ░░░░░░░░ in law Your daughter ░░░░░░░░ meet that definition and ░░░░░░░░ the question is Did ░░░░░░░░ you follow that regulation ░░░░░░░░ you have the appropriate ░░░░░░░░ ethic official look into ░░░░░░░░ Did you seek guidance ░░░░░░░░ the federal regulation requires ░░░░░░░░ memorandum is aimed at ░░░░░░░░ and threats of violence ░░░░░░░░ that we all juice ░░░░░░░░ me it you seek ░░░░░░░░ counsel before you issued ░░░░░░░░ letter that director relates ░░░░░░░░ the financial interest of ░░░░░░░░ family Yes or no ░░░░░░░░ memorandum does not relate ░░░░░░░░ the financial interests of ░░░░░░░░ It s a threat ░░░░░░░░ s gonna Take that ░░░░░░░░ a know I take ░░░░░░░░ as a new memorandum ░░░░░░░░ against violence and threats ░░░░░░░░ violence will you mister ░░░░░░░░ general Will you commit ░░░░░░░░ having the appropriate ethics ░░░░░░░░ t need review the ░░░░░░░░ And make the results ░░░░░░░░ This memorandum is aimed ░░░░░░░░ violence and threats of ░░░░░░░░ I understand you re ░░░░░░░░ point you re not ░░░░░░░░ My question is for ░░░░░░░░ general with all due ░░░░░░░░ where you submit to ░░░░░░░░ ethics review this matter ░░░░░░░░ or no there s ░░░░░░░░ company in America or ░░░░░░░░ no law abiding citizen ░░░░░░░░ who believes that threats ░░░░░░░░ violence should not be ░░░░░░░░ no conflict of interest ░░░░░░░░ anyone could have According ░░░░░░░░ you but certain with ░░░░░░░░ respect That s the ░░░░░░░░ of the federal regulation ░░░░░░░░ need objective third parties ░░░░░░░░ of your activities You ░░░░░░░░ t get to make ░░░░░░░░ decision yourself It doesn ░░░░░░░░ matter you re the ░░░░░░░░ you re the chief ░░░░░░░░ enforcement this country This ░░░░░░░░ questions in the minds ░░░░░░░░ millions of Americans and ░░░░░░░░ re impartial Reality is ░░░░░░░░ called into question Why ░░░░░░░░ you not submit to ░░░░░░░░ simple ethics review of ░░░░░░░░ I am exquisitely aware ░░░░░░░░ the ethics requirements that ░░░░░░░░ re not following them ░░░░░░░░ have followed them and ░░░░░░░░ with them for the ░░░░░░░░ 20 five year Did ░░░░░░░░ seek an ethics review ░░░░░░░░ this or not gonna ░░░░░░░░ again There are no ░░░░░░░░ of interest involved when ░░░░░░░░ Justice Department cake Okay ░░░░░░░░ to you I got ░░░░░░░░ I m not trying ░░░░░░░░ be disrespectful but you ░░░░░░░░ not respecting Our rules ░░░░░░░░ constitutional norms and the ░░░░░░░░ law that directly applies