Brzezinski: Clinton ‘Should Have Ran a Real Campaign’ Engaging Real People

SCARABOROUGH: “You want to run against Clinton. You don't want to run against Bernie Sanders. If you as the outside radical candidate being able to run against a Bush in a primary and Clinton in the general election, that’s drawing an inside straight. And 'The Wall Street Journal' this morning basically said, Mika, people that the easier targets right now, do not sense what 2016 is all about.”
BRZEZINSKI: “This is called the inevitability coming to bite you in the butt because quite frankly, they should have ran a good campaign where she engaged with real human beings, really good ones from the get go, and the DNC did not control the debates, then she would be better off now because she would be out there acrobatic, ready to go and well oiled and in it. And instead, she’s 10 because she’s been hiding. It’s not Hillary Clinton. It’s the forces around her. 'The Wall Street' journal editorial board writes taking Sanders seriously. 'It’s time to take Bernie Sanders seriously. The Vermont Senator is leading in Iowa and New Hampshire and in Sunday’s debate he sounded for the first time like a candidate who thinks he can win. He still isn’t the favorite against the Clinton machine, but it’s no longer impossible to imagine the 74-year-old socialist as the Democratic nominee. He has moved the democratic debate sharply to the left forcing Hillary Clinton to chase him. Many Republicans claim to welcome a Sanders nomination under the assumption he would be easy to beat. Don’t be so sure. We aren’t predicting this but in a campaign that’s already busted Normal American conventions, the possibility of an extreme election outcome is no longer unthinkable.'"