DOC: CDC Saying Covid Shots ‘Safe and Effective’ Is ‘a Lie,’ Not Even a ‘Scientific Term’

‘There was uncertainty when we authorized the booster’

EXCERPT:

FRAIMAN: "Well -- are mRNA shots safe and effective? Well, I would say that from the day that these were authorized in December, there was uncertainty on if they were going -- if the benefits were going to outweigh the harm. We didn't know. We did not know. It's not possible to have known that at that time. There were four people I believe, who voted against authorizing it that day, in a climate of when everyone was scared, almost everyone to vote no on that. So there's uncertainty. There was definitely uncertainty on young people, people with no risk factors. That's clear. There was uncertainty when we authorized the booster. That is clear. We had all the scientists in -- or nearly all, vote to not authorize it. They voted against authorizing it. Then the FDA came back and said, 'OK, how about just in over 65? Then they said, 'Yes, we'll do it in over 65.' Then the CDC, two to three weeks later tries to authorize the booster for all ages. They've -- scientists advisory board votes against it. CDC goes, 'Let's not listen to these guys. Just recommends it for all age groups.' The safe and effective terminology that's been used has been based on -- it's just -- you know, it's uncertainty This is based on -- it's -- it's a lie. It has to be."

 

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact