Todd: ‘There’s Legitimate Questions, Legitimate Vulnerability’ for Clinton on Libya

‘There was the exact same recommendations essentially given in 1998 or 1999 after the embassy attacks that took place in East Africa’

SCARBOROUGH: “Chuck, I do find it hard to belief anything is going to come out today that hasn’t come out over the past eight or nine hearings that’s been conducted, conducted by Republicans, as well as Democrats. Now if you look at some of the polls here, new NBC news poll is interesting. More Americans than not unsatisfied with Hillary’s response to the Benghazi attack. I’m expecting a big tune out factor today with the Benghazi hearings because of all the politicization."
TODD: “If Joe Biden announced he was running, there would be a different set of eye balls, there would be different way people would watch this. here’s two serious inquiries that are worth asking the secretary about. Number one is this issue of embassy security. There was the exact same recommendations essentially given in 1998 or 1999 after the embassy attacks that took place in east Africa. So none of them, four secretaries of state failed to do this. You could start with Albright all the way through Powell, Rice and Clinton on that front. And the second is Libya policy. The decision going in the first place. If the Republicans concentrate on that, that’s where there’s legitimate questions, legitimate vulnerability on the secretary's part. But Joe, I am with you. Overall, anybody who thinks Hillary is going to go in and lie is going to assume she is lying. Everybody that thinks that they are going in there, that the Republicans are in there for political witch hunt --. By the way, those are the only people watching. I don't think that anybody that's unsure what happened will be watch it."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact