Rep. Schiff: ‘No,’ I Wasn’t Wrong; There’s Ample Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion

‘As I said, there is evidence of collusion and corrupt co-mingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians’

This story is cross-posted at our consumer site, Grabien News. Watch it there – without audiomarks.

EXCERPT:

GEIST: “But do you accept the fundamental conclusion in that four-page letter, that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians?”
SCHIFF: “I accept Mueller’s conclusion, and I assume Barr wouldn’t misrepresent this, that he could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the crime of conspiracy. But as I said, there is evidence of collusion and corrupt co-mingling of work between the Trump campaign and the Russians. But I fully accept that as a prosecutor that he couldn’t prove beyond a reasonable doubt that crime. And as you know, because I’ve made this distinction on your show, I always said well there was ample evidence of collusion in the public record --"
GEIST: "Right."
SCHIFF: "-- whether Bob Mueller could prove the crime of conspiracy beyond reasonable doubt would be up to him and I would accept judgment and I do.”

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Fox News: Adam Schiff Refuses to Answer if He Has Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion 5 Months Later
Hannity: Mueller’s Investigation Is a ‘Witch Hunt’ and a ‘Total Sham’ and ‘For the Sake of the Country, It Needs to End’
Tucker Battles Rep. Swalwell on Evidence of Russia Collusion: ‘I’m Not Flacking For Trump!’
Bartiromo Demands Dem Congressman Provide Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion in Heated Clash
Hannity on Mueller Filings: ‘Zero Evidence in any of These Documents of Trump Russia Collusion, Zero’