Fox’s Jarrett on Trump Removal Under 25th Amendment: I Wonder If They Can Even Read

‘She either misunderstands or misinterprets it’

This story is cross-posted at our consumer site, Grabien News. Watch it there – without audiomarks.

EXCERPT:

JARRETT: "There is no legal precedence for it. Section 4, which would be the involuntary invoking of the 25th Amendment. The people who are advocating this, I wonder if they can even read. Have they read the 25th Amendment? Sheila Jackson Lee, congresswoman, says, 'The President is ill-suited and incompetent, therefore invoking the 25th Amendment is demanded.' Well, even if he were incompetent, that’s not the legal basis for it. It has to be functional incapacity — somebody who has a stroke, somebody who has an accident or in the case of JFK, what if he had survived but was brain-damaged. That’s how it all came about. So she either misunderstands or misinterprets it, one or the other. I think she just doesn’t like this particular president. She doesn’t like his politics. The only mechanism for removal there is called the ballot box, it's an election.”

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact