Mo Brooks on Preexisting Conditions Being Covered in Bill: ‘That’s Not My Understanding’

‘My understanding is that it will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool that helps offset all these costs’

This story is cross-posted at our consumer site, Grabien News. Watch it there – without audiomarks.

EXCERPT:

BROOKS: “That’s not my understanding of the way the bill has been reframed. My understanding is that it will allow insurance companies to require people who have higher health care costs to contribute more to the insurance pool that helps offset all these costs, thereby reducing the cost to those people who lead good lives, they are healthy, you know, they have done the things to keep their bodies healthy. And right now, those are the people who have done things the right way that are seeing their costs skyrocketing. Now, in fairness, a lot of these people with pre-existing conditions, they have those conditions through no fault of their own, and I think our society under those circumstances needs to help. The challenge though is that it’s a tough balancing act between the higher cost of these mandates which denies people coverage because they can’t afford the health insurance policies anymore on the one hand and having enough coverage to help those people who are truly in need."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Mulvaney: ‘The Debate About Preexisting Conditions Is Over; Both Parties Support Them’
Mark Sanford: Pre-Existing Conditions Are Covered in the GOP Health Care Bill
Sanders to Cassidy on Preexisting Conditions: Your Bill Allows Insurance Companies to Charge What They Want
Jim VandeHei: Republicans Have ‘Struggled to Come to a Unified Position’ on Healthcare
Mike Coffman: I Think There’s Still a Chance of Getting 216 Votes for Health Care Reform