CNN’s Honig on Fani Willis Ruling: ‘They Have Survived But Not Without Substantial Damage’

SIDNER Paula Reid I ░░░░░░░░ you re puring over ░░░░░░░░ and we will get ░░░░░░░░ to you as soon ░░░░░░░░ you get more new ░░░░░░░░ I do want to ░░░░░░░░ now to Elie Honig ░░░░░░░░ is what I m ░░░░░░░░ in the language The ░░░░░░░░ of this case cannot ░░░░░░░░ until the state selects ░░░░░░░░ of two options So ░░░░░░░░ clear there he s ░░░░░░░░ You cannot go forward ░░░░░░░░ what HONIG One of ░░░░░░░░ has to go either ░░░░░░░░ D A or the ░░░░░░░░ office or Nathan Wade ░░░░░░░░ will be the easiest ░░░░░░░░ that D A s ░░░░░░░░ has ever had to ░░░░░░░░ Obviously Nathan Wade will ░░░░░░░░ and the judge in ░░░░░░░░ ruling says essentially this ░░░░░░░░ necessary to preserve public ░░░░░░░░ in this case He ░░░░░░░░ there s enough of ░░░░░░░░ appearance there s enough ░░░░░░░░ as he says at ░░░░░░░░ point an odor of ░░░░░░░░ around this case interesting ░░░░░░░░ that something s got ░░░░░░░░ be done to at ░░░░░░░░ clean up the public ░░░░░░░░ That this thing smells ░░░░░░░░ Yes of mendacity whatever ░░░░░░░░ smells like BOLDUAN But ░░░░░░░░ just because what you ░░░░░░░░ talking about the whole ░░░░░░░░ was so messy and ░░░░░░░░ s what Michael Moore ░░░░░░░░ saying this could have ░░░░░░░░ nipped in the bud ░░░░░░░░ Right Again it s ░░░░░░░░ important to underscore here ░░░░░░░░ big takeaway Fani Willis ░░░░░░░░ on the case The ░░░░░░░░ A s office keeps ░░░░░░░░ case The case can ░░░░░░░░ on That is far ░░░░░░░░ away the bold headline ░░░░░░░░ have survived but not ░░░░░░░░ substantial damage I mean ░░░░░░░░ s some really stark ░░░░░░░░ in this ruling The ░░░░░░░░ calls out the D ░░░░░░░░ s tremendous lack in ░░░░░░░░ the odor of mendacity ░░░░░░░░ says that the speech ░░░░░░░░ public speech she made ░░░░░░░░ the church was legally ░░░░░░░░ and the judge even ░░░░░░░░ in the ruling it ░░░░░░░░ be time for a ░░░░░░░░ order on the D ░░░░░░░░ because she keeps on ░░░░░░░░ improper public statements He ░░░░░░░░ it out there he ░░░░░░░░ t say I m ░░░░░░░░ one but he raises ░░░░░░░░ possibility of a gag ░░░░░░░░ on the D A ░░░░░░░░ gag order s on ░░░░░░░░ Trump because we collectively ░░░░░░░░ that he may be ░░░░░░░░ the jury pool and ░░░░░░░░ the judge floats the ░░░░░░░░ possibility So the D ░░░░░░░░ s office has survived ░░░░░░░░ case survives it will ░░░░░░░░ on At what pace ░░░░░░░░ ll see but there ░░░░░░░░ some damage done here.”