Chaffetz: ‘Evidence’ for a Special Prosecutor to Investigate Russia Links Is ‘Flimsy at Best’

‘I see almost no evidence of direct ties between Russia and collusion with the Trump campaign in any way’

EXCERPT:

KING: "You don’t think we need a special prosecutor?" 
CHAFFETZ: "No, I don’t at this point. I think evidence is flimsy at best. I see almost no evidence of direct ties between Russia and collusion with the Trump campaign in any way, shape, or firm. Were there some incidental contacts and communications? Yes. But does that mean there was collusion? I don’t see any evidence of that." 

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact
Similar stories
Blumenthal: We Can’t Count on the AG to Investigate Flynn, We Need a Special Prosecutor
Andre Carson: A Special Prosecutor to Investigate Trump-Russia Ties Would ‘Protect the President’
CBS: Trump Call for Special Prosecutor ‘Strikes Fear’ in Hearts of Clinton Allies
It Only Took Five Hours for Chuck Schumer to Flip-Flop on Special Prosecutor Appointment
Democrat Doug Schoen Calls for Special Prosecutor to Investigate Hillary Clinton