NYT’s Barro: ‘Massive’ Gun Grab Only Way To Impact Violent Crime

‘Changes with background checks will help at the margin, but I wouldn’t expect that to have big impacts on the rate of violent crime in the country’

CAPEHART: "Hillary Clinton made her comments about gun reform. What do you make of that? I’ll start with you, Josh."

BARRO: "It’s what I would expect a Democratic presidential candidate to say. But if Hillary Clinton becomes president, she’ll be a president facing a Republican House at least, possibly also a Republican senate. So I don’t think that there will be significant change in gun policy if Hillary Clinton is president. I mean, we already have a Democratic president now and we haven’t had significant change on it. 

But I would also note, the things that we talk about in the United States are so at the margins on this stuff that I wonder how they would impact gun violence. If you did something like Australia did, where you really take away massive amounts of guns that people have, reduce the rate of gun ownership substantially in society, you could have a big impact on violent crime. 

But, I mean, changes with background checks will help at the margin, but I wouldn’t expect that to have big impacts on the rate of violent crime in the country, which I think is part of the reason you haven’t had the knock down drag out fight from proponents that could have on this. Because I think there is a sense that while these changes would be positive changes, they would not be sea changes."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact