Krauthammer: Obama Has Always Had the Ambition To Be the Anti-Reagan

‘In 2008, he said Ronald Reagan was historically consequential ... he changed the ideological trajectory of America after 50 years of liberalism’

BREAM: "So looking at it in that context, do you think it's a fair comparison, Charles?"
KRAUTHAMMER: "No. I think this is a guy who's had a good week, and he's shown us as having nothing at all to do with him, but is now a little bit cocky about it and wants to write his own history. Churchill once said 'History will be kind to me, I intend to write it.' What Obama is doing now, he's trying to write it. Look, he has always had the ambition of being the anti-Reagan. He talked about it. In 2008 he said Ronald Reagan was historically consequential in a way that a Nixon and a Clinton was not. Meaning that Reagan changed the ideological trajectory of America after 50 years of liberalism -- within ten minutes Reagan declares the government is not the solution, government is the problem, which is a denial of the fundamental tenets of the new deal. But the reason that Reaganism became ascendant for 30 years -- and the reason Obama sees himself as the man to undo it -- is because Reaganism succeeded. It is true that Obama has changed America. ObamaCare in and of itself is the most consequential piece of legislation in a generation. But if it doesn't succeed, if it fails, if it turns out to be a disaster, that will be the end of Obamaism. It has to succeed. It has to have a successor in Hillary and it has to actually work. So we don't know.But this has been his aspiration and now he wants to crow about it."

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact