Mark Levin: Political Operatives with ‘Whiteboards’ Should Know Better

‘It is frustrating to me to listen and watch people who have no experience in civil litigation, know nothing about civil litigation’

EXCERPT:

LEVIN: “In other words, expert testimony, given an affidavit, should be more than sufficient to establish a reasonable basis to file a complaint and justify expedited fast discovery. So it’s all wrong when you hear legal analysts and hosts say, 'Where is all the evidence? Where is all the evidence?' This is a civil suit. So you have the bar you need to pass, so your case is not dismissed, then you conduct discovery. Written discovery, document demands, depositions and so forth on an expedited level. That is how it's supposed to work. So it is frustrating to me to listen and watch people who have no experience in civil litigation, know nothing about civil litigation, or former federal prosecutors and professors who should know better saying the same thing, or political operatives with whiteboards and without whiteboards, 'I’m afraid there is no evidence, we don’t have the evidence. There's no evidence.' So if judges prevent the Trump campaign from going forth, for example, involving the Dominion voting system, they are never going to gather the 'evidence' that is necessary in a trial, in a court proceeding or where you're seeking some kind of remedy or relief, because you don’t go to court with boxes and boxes full of evidence. Sometimes you can, but you not required to.”

Video files
Full
Compact
Audio files
Full
Compact