Jim Jordan: ‘Sure Looks Like’ that the FBI Sat on Evidence that Would Have Exonerated General Flynn

EXCERPT:

VARNEY: "Let’s be clear here. You are saying, and everybody is saying, that the FBI sat on exculpatory evidence that would have exculpated, so to speak, General Flynn? That’s what --"
JORDAN: "That's --"
VARNEY: "-- they allegedly did, right?"
JORDAN: "That’s -- that's the news today. It sure looks like that’s what happened. But we also know based on depositions, based on things that we've already learned that the agents who interviewed General Flynn didn’t think he was giving them any misinformation, didn’t think he was lying in any way whatsoever, and yet they still pursued him, still went after him for supposedly lying to the FBI, even though the agents doing the -- the interview didn’t think he was. And one of those agents, of course, was the now famous Peter Strzok. So that’s what’s also so egregious about what happened to, again, this three-star general who served our country."